Literature DB >> 19358686

Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques.

Aditya Bagrodia1, Jay D Raman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze and compare physician perspectives of musculoskeletal ergonomic parameters associated with open, pure laparoscopic, and robot-assisted prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survey questions were designed to evaluate physician musculoskeletal discomfort during open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. The survey instrument was distributed to physician members of the Endourological Society (ES) and Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) after approval from the respective organizations. We queried about the presence of chronic neck and/or back pain, relationship of musculoskeletal pain to operating, and pain characteristics associated with open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted prostatectomies. Physicians were also asked to rank the three operative approaches with respect to associated pain and discomfort and to comment if practice patterns were impacted by these ergonomic variables.
RESULTS: There were 106 urologists who completed the survey. Chronic neck and/or back pain was present in 43% of urologists who responded to this survey. Of those surgeons with baseline neck/back pain, 50% indicated that operating caused or exacerbated this musculoskeletal pain. Furthermore, 25% of respondents indicated that musculoskeletal pain considerations impacted their choice of operative approach. Neck and/or back pain was experienced in 50%, 56%, and 23% of surgeons after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted prostatectomy, respectively. When ranking operative approach in order of decreasing amounts of associated pain, 32% indicated open>laparoscopic>robot-assisted, 28% responded that none caused pain, and 25% selected laparoscopic>open>robot-assisted. Three percent selected permutations, with robot-assisted causing the most discomfort.
CONCLUSION: Urologists who responded to our study indicate that open and laparoscopic prostatectomy cause more musculoskeletal discomfort than a robot-assisted approach. Of urologists performing robot-assisted prostatectomies, however, 23% suggested that this approach also was associated with physical pain. Furthermore, physicians do take into account ergonomic considerations when determining an operative approach. Studies with actual physician monitoring and electromyography are requisite to more thoroughly delineate the ergonomics of performing a radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19358686     DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  20 in total

1.  [Pyeloplasty - pro robotic-assisted].

Authors:  Z Akçetin; S Siemer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lukasz Filip Grochola; Christopher Soll; Adrian Zehnder; Roland Wyss; Pascal Herzog; Stefan Breitenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Analysis of the posture pattern during robotic simulator tasks using an optical motion capture system.

Authors:  Kenta Takayasu; Kenji Yoshida; Takao Mishima; Masato Watanabe; Tadashi Matsuda; Hidefumi Kinoshita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Intraoperative workload in robotic surgery assessed by wearable motion tracking sensors and questionnaires.

Authors:  Denny Yu; Cem Dural; Melissa M B Morrow; Liyun Yang; Justin W Collins; Susan Hallbeck; Magnus Kjellman; Mikael Forsman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Timothy A Plerhoples; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sherry M Wren
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-12-13

Review 7.  Musculoskeletal pain among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tina Dalager; Karen Søgaard; Katrine Tholstrup Bech; Ole Mogensen; Pernille Tine Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Yun Zhang; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Robotic hypospadias surgery: a new evolution.

Authors:  Pasquale Casale; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-11-26

Review 10.  Surgical ergonomics for urologists: a practical guide.

Authors:  Andrew T Gabrielson; Marisa M Clifton; Christian P Pavlovich; Michael J Biles; Mitchell Huang; Jacqueline Agnew; Phillip M Pierorazio; Brian R Matlaga; Petar Bajic; Zeyad R Schwen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.