Literature DB >> 19357624

Innate and adaptive immune responses in contact dermatitis: analogy with infections.

M A Freudenberg1, P R Esser, T Jakob, C Galanos, S F Martin.   

Abstract

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is an inflammatory skin disease of great and steadily increasing importance as an occupational health problem. The disease is induced by chemicals and metal ions which penetrate the skin and form complexes with host proteins. This process is accompanied by a strong, allergen-induced inflammatory reaction and leads to the migration of allergen-carrying dendritic cells (DC) from the skin to regional lymph nodes, where they promote generation of allergen-specific T cells. The latter are the ultimate effector cells of the disease. Re-exposure to the causative agent leads to the recruitment of the T effector cells, which then elicit the typical skin inflammatory reaction at the site of contact. Although DC and effector T cells play a protagonistic role in the sensitization and elicitation phase of ACD, respectively, other cell types including keratinocytes, NK cells, mast cells and B cells contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. In this review the authors summarize recent findings that identify stress responses and innate immune pathways triggered by contact allergens and review recent data regarding the adaptive T cell response. The new data were collected mainly from studies on contact hypersensitivity (CHS), the corresponding experimental mouse model of human ACD. The elucidation of the molecular events involved in contact allergen-induced innate responses will help to design new treatment strategies and may allow to develop predictive in vitro assays for the identification of contact allergens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19357624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G Ital Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0392-0488            Impact factor:   2.011


  11 in total

Review 1.  T-cell recognition of chemicals, protein allergens and drugs: towards the development of in vitro assays.

Authors:  Stefan F Martin; Philipp R Esser; Sonja Schmucker; Lisa Dietz; Dean J Naisbitt; B Kevin Park; Marc Vocanson; Jean-Francois Nicolas; Monika Keller; Werner J Pichler; Matthias Peiser; Andreas Luch; Reinhard Wanner; Enrico Maggi; Andrea Cavani; Thomas Rustemeyer; Anne Richter; Hermann-Josef Thierse; Federica Sallusto
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Nickel induces interleukin-1β secretion via the NLRP3-ASC-caspase-1 pathway.

Authors:  Xiujin Li; Fei Zhong
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 3.  Nickel allergies: paying the Toll for innate immunity.

Authors:  Marc Schmidt; Matthias Goebeler
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Crucial role for human Toll-like receptor 4 in the development of contact allergy to nickel.

Authors:  Marc Schmidt; Badrinarayanan Raghavan; Verena Müller; Thomas Vogl; György Fejer; Sandrine Tchaptchet; Simone Keck; Christoph Kalis; Peter J Nielsen; Chris Galanos; Johannes Roth; Arne Skerra; Stefan F Martin; Marina A Freudenberg; Matthias Goebeler
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Heat Shock Protein 90's Mechanistic Role in Contact Hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Seong-Min Kim; Bradley Studnitzer; Aaron Esser-Kahn
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.426

6.  Lack of the purinergic receptor P2X(7) results in resistance to contact hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Felix C Weber; Philipp R Esser; Tobias Müller; Jayanthi Ganesan; Patrizia Pellegatti; Markus M Simon; Robert Zeiser; Marco Idzko; Thilo Jakob; Stefan F Martin
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 7.  [Extended understanding of pathogenesis and treatment of contact allergy].

Authors:  Philipp R Esser; Stefan F Martin
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.751

8.  Toll-like receptor 3 increases allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Naomi Nakamura; Risa Tamagawa-Mineoka; Mayumi Ueta; Shigeru Kinoshita; Norito Katoh
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  A genomic biomarker signature can predict skin sensitizers using a cell-based in vitro alternative to animal tests.

Authors:  Henrik Johansson; Malin Lindstedt; Ann-Sofie Albrekt; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Contact sensitizers induce skin inflammation via ROS production and hyaluronic acid degradation.

Authors:  Philipp R Esser; Ute Wölfle; Christoph Dürr; Friederike D von Loewenich; Christoph M Schempp; Marina A Freudenberg; Thilo Jakob; Stefan F Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.