| Literature DB >> 19356235 |
Bianca Pluess1, Ivo Mueller, Damien Levi, Graham King, Thomas A Smith, Christian Lengeler.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For companies operating in malaria endemic countries, malaria represents a substantial risk to workers and their dependants, and can lead to significantly reduced worker productivity. This study provides an overview of the malaria epidemiology within an oil palm plantation in Popondetta, south-eastern Papua New Guinea, its implication for the company with its employees and their families and the potential for control.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19356235 PMCID: PMC2682491 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-56
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Average monthly rainfall within the study area from 2004 to 2006.
Figure 2A typical worker's house.
Description of cross-sectional survey participants
| Sex | Male | 423 (50.2) | ||
| Female | 419 (49.8) | |||
| Total | 842 | |||
| Age | 0–4 | 169 (20.1) | 89 (21.1) | 79 (18.9) |
| 5–9 | 148(17.6) | 76 (18.0) | 72 (17.2) | |
| 10–19 | 117 (13.9) | 47 (11.1) | 70 (16.7) | |
| 20–39 | 344 (40.9) | 167 (39.6) | 177 (42.2) | |
| >40 | 64 (7.6) | 43 (10.2) | 21 (5.0) | |
| Total | 842 | 422 | 419 | |
| Origin | Oro | 480 (57.1) | 218 (51.8) | 261 (62.4) |
| Morobe | 160 (19.1) | 97 (23.0) | 63 (15.1) | |
| Oro/Morobe | 46 (5.5) | 24 (5.7) | 22 (5.3) | |
| Other provinces | 157(18.3) | 82(19.5) | 72(17.2) | |
| Total | 840 | 421 | 418 | |
| Work | Permanent | 238 (28.2) | 205 (86.1) | 33 (13.9) |
| Casual | 57 (6.8) | 7 (12.3) | 50 (87.7) | |
| Not working | 548 (65.0) | 211 (38.6) | 336 (61.4) | |
| Total | 843 | 423 | 419 | |
| Work department | Field | 211 (89.4) | 178 (87.7) | 33 (100.0) |
| Security | 12 (5.1) | 12 (5.9) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Transport | 7 (3.0) | 7 (3.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Mill | 4 (1.7) | 4 (2.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Growers | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
| HR | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Finance | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Total | 236 | 203 | 33 | |
| Work casual | Collect mama lusfrut | 22 (38.6) | 0 | 22 (44.0) |
| Weeding | 13 (22.8) | 1 (14.3) | 12 (24.0) | |
| Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) distribution | 8 (14.0) | 1 (14.3) | 7 (14.0) | |
| Fertilizer application | 6 (10.5) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (12.0) | |
| Harvest helper | 3 (5.3) | 2 (28.6) | 1 (2.0) | |
| Other | 5 (8.8) | 3 (42.9) | 2 (4.0) | |
| Total | 57 | 7 | 50 | |
Malaria prevalence and bed net usage, by estates and by villages (cross-sectional survey).
| 177 | 36; 20.3 | 28; 15.8 | 6; 3.4 | 84.3 | |
| 279 | 91; 32.6 | 56; 20.0 | 35; 12.5 | 69.7 | |
| 267 | 115; 43.1 | 60; 22.5 | 50; 18.7 | 63.3 | |
| 68 | 12; 17.7 | 9; 13.2 | 2; 2.9 | 97.5 | |
| 109 | 24; 22.0 | 19; 17.4 | 4; 3.7 | 75.8 | |
| 154 | 48; 31.2 | 28; 18.1 | 23; 14.8 | 65.6 | |
| 125 | 43; 34.4 | 28; 22.4 | 12; 9.6 | 75.0 | |
| 137 | 57; 41.6 | 33; 24.1 | 21; 15.3 | 57.6 | |
| 130 | 58; 44.6 | 27; 20.8 | 29; 22.3 | 68.9 | |
Figure 3Malaria prevalence (all species) by age group, with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4Malaria prevalence by species and age group, with 95% confidence intervals.
Risk factors for getting a malaria infection (cross-sectional survey).
| Village | |||||
| Moale | 154 | 48 (31.2) | 1 | 0.00 | |
| Epa | 68 | 12 (17.7) | 0.5 | 0.2–1.0 | 0.00 |
| Irigi | 109 | 24 (22.0) | 0.6 | 0.3–1.1 | |
| Javuni | 125 | 43 (34.4) | 1.1 | 0.7–1.9 | |
| Irihambo | 137 | 57 (41.6) | 1.5 | 0.8–2.6 | |
| Sumbiripa | 130 | 58 (44.6) | 1.2 | 1.1–3.2 | |
| Sex | 0.9 | 0.6–1.3 | 0.51 | ||
| Age | |||||
| 0–4 | 130 | 37 (28.5) | 1 | 0.14 | |
| 5–9 | 129 | 52 (40.3) | 1.9 | 1.1–3.2 | |
| 10–19 | 101 | 32 (31.7) | 1.1 | 0.6–2.0 | |
| 20–39 | 306 | 103 (33.7) | 1.2 | 0.6–2.3 | |
| >40 | 56 | 18 (32.1) | 1.0 | 0.4–2.4 | |
| Work permanent (vs not working (= dependants)) | 215 | 74 (34.4) | 1.0 | 0.5–1.8 | 1.00 |
| Work casual (vs not working (= dependants)) | 50 | 18 (36.0) | 1.0 | 0.5–2.1 | |
| Sleep under a bed net (yes vs no) | 507 | 160 (31.6) | 1.2 | 0.8–1.7 | 0.39 |
| Sleep on veranda (yes vs no) | 136 | 44 (32.4) | 1.1 | 0.4–1.3 | 0.56 |
| Sleep in a shelter (yes vs no) | 63 | 25 (39.7) | 0.7 | 0.4–1.3 | 0.25 |
| Get up before 7 am (vs getting up after 7 am) | 538 | 181 (33.6) | 0.9 | 0.8–1.1 | 0.51 |
Figure 5Monthly routine malaria incidence data from 2005 to 2006.