Literature DB >> 1935543

The intrasession repeatability of pattern electroretinograms and the effects of digital filtering.

P Bartel1, P Becker, E Robinson.   

Abstract

Transient pattern electroretinograms were recorded in 12 normal young volunteers with the use of 12' and 30' checkerboard stimuli and 1 c/deg and 2.5 c/deg vertical gratings. The intrasession repeatability of pattern electroretinograms was determined by employing alternative statistics to the frequently used correlation coefficients. Comparisons were made with the repeatability of cone electroretinograms elicited by ganzfeld stimulation. The coefficient of repeatability was substantially lower (better) for pattern electroretinogram b-wave implicit times than for a-wave implicit times and b-wave amplitudes, the latter having high coefficients of repeatability. Cone electroretinograms had better repeatability with respect to all three parameters. Digital filtering using a bandpass of 1-40 Hz was applied to the original pattern electroretinograms recorded with a bandpass of 1-250 Hz. Although peak definition was generally enhanced, repeatability did not show marked improvement. Differences between broadband analogue-filtered pattern electroretinograms and the same responses with high-frequency noise removed by digital filtering need to be taken into account. The coefficient of repeatability statistic appears to facilitate the assessment of pattern electroretinograms and permits the comparison of the repeatability of both implicit time and amplitude parameters irrespective of absolute values. The implications of the relatively poor repeatability of pattern electroretinogram b-wave amplitudes for clinical applications need to be considered.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1935543     DOI: 10.1007/bf00142673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  5 in total

Review 1.  The pattern electroretinogram: technical aspects and clinical significance.

Authors:  S Rimmer; B Katz
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.177

2.  Variability of the pattern electroretinogram.

Authors:  K Holopigian; J Snow; W Seiple; I Siegel
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Pattern electroretinography in patients with delayed pattern visual evoked potentials due to distal anterior visual pathway dysfunction.

Authors:  G E Holder
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Effects of chlorpromazine on pattern and flash ERGs and VEPs compared to oxazepam and to placebo in normal subjects.

Authors:  P Bartel; M Blom; E Robinson; C Van der Meyden; D O Sommers; P Becker
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct
  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti; Lori M Ventura
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Acute effects of cigarette smoking on pattern electroretinogram.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; A Hakan Durukan; Tarkan Mumcuoglu; Gungor Sobaci; M Zeki Bayraktar
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The pattern electroretinogram as a tool to monitor progressive retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in the DBA/2J mouse model of glaucoma.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti; Maher Saleh; Mahesh Nagaraju
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Pattern electroretinogram to detect glaucoma: comparing the PERGLA and the PERG Ratio protocols.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Anke Ramharter-Sereinig
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Prognostic value of pattern reversal visual-evoked potentials in idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  M A Tilanus; M H Cuypers; N A Bemelmans; A J Pinckers
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Pattern electroretinogram abnormality and glaucoma.

Authors:  Lori M Ventura; Vittorio Porciatti; Kyoko Ishida; William J Feuer; Richard K Parrish
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Reproducibility of pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with a range of severity of disease with the new glaucoma paradigm.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Fredette; Douglas R Anderson; Vittorio Porciatti; William Feuer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 12.079

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.