Literature DB >> 16678497

Total laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage 1 endometrial cancer: the LACE randomized controlled trial.

M Janda1, V Gebski, P Forder, D Jackson, G Williams, A Obermair.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological malignancy in Australia and the US. Current standard treatment involves open surgery to remove the uterus, and both tubes and ovaries (TAH). The Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium (LACE) trial was designed to assess equivalence of performing this in a total laparoscopic approach (TLH).
METHODS: Patient recruitment was designed to proceed along two stages to accommodate for a potential increase in patient requests of laparoscopic surgery. During the first stage, patients are randomised in a 2:1 allocation to receive TLH or TAH, with the primary endpoint quality of life (QoL) at 6 month post-surgery, requiring 180 patients to be enrolled to have 80% power at alpha=0.05 to detect a clinically significant difference of 8 points on the Functional Assessment of Cancer General (FACT-G) QoL instrument. If additional recruitment of patients seems impossible after accrual of 180 patients, this cohort will be followed for 4 years, and disease free survival (DFS) of patients treated by TLH will be compared to DFS within the endometrial cancer population. During the second stage, recruitment will be extended to a total of 590 patients in a 1:1 TLH:TAH allocation, to assess the equivalence with respect to DFS with 80% power and alpha=0.05. Equivalence will be assumed if the difference in DFS does not exceed 7% at 4 years. Secondary outcomes include treatment related morbidity; costs and cost-effectiveness; patterns of recurrence; and overall survival. All data from this multicentre study will be entered using online electronic case report forms (e-CRF), allowing real time assessment of data completeness and patient follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The LACE trial will establish the equivalence of a TLH approach for patients with stage 1 endometrial cancer following a two stage protocol to accommodate potential threats to patient recruitment through requests for laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16678497     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  11 in total

Review 1.  Role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Paul S Lin; Mark T Wakabayashi; Ernest S Han
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-04-08

2.  Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: a trend shift from laparotomy to laparoscopy.

Authors:  Erik Qvigstad; Marit Lieng
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-07-13

3.  Implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer over the past decade.

Authors:  Tim Wollinga; Nicole P M Ezendam; Florine A Eggink; Marieke Smink; Dennis van Hamont; Brenda Pijlman; Erik Boss; Elisabeth J Robbe; Huy Ngo; Dorry Boll; Constantijne H Mom; Maaike A van der Aa; Roy F L P Kruitwagen; Hans W Nijman; Johanna M A Pijnenborg
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2018-02-27

4.  Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001).

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Vardar; Ahmet Baris Guzel; Salih Taskin; Mete Gungor; Nejat Ozgul; Coskun Salman; Umran Kucukgoz-Gulec; Ghanim Khatib; Cagatay Taskiran; Ilkkan Dünder; Firat Ortac; Kunter Yuce; Cosan Terek; Tayup Simsek; Aydın Ozsaran; Anil Onan; Gonca Coban; Samet Topuz; Fuat Demirkiran; Ozguc Takmaz; M Faruk Kose; Ahmet Gocmen; Gulsah Seydaoglu; Derya Gumurdulu; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials.

Authors:  Claudia B M Bijen; Karin M Vermeulen; Marian J E Mourits; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Monika Janda; Katharina Merollini; Val Gebski; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Sentinel node biopsy for diagnosis of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Hans Nagar; Nina Wietek; Richard J Goodall; Will Hughes; Mia Schmidt-Hansen; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-09

8.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Khadra Galaal; Hannah Donkers; Andrew Bryant; Alberto D Lopes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-31

9.  Does the Type of Surgical Approach and the Use of Uterine Manipulators Influence the Disease-Free Survival and Recurrence Rates in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer?

Authors:  Josefa Marcos-Sanmartín; José Antonio López Fernández; José Sánchez-Payá; Óscar Cruz Piñero-Sánchez; María José Román-Sánchez; María Asunción Quijada-Cazorla; María Amparo Candela-Hidalgo; Juan Carlos Martínez-Escoriza
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Survival implication of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for apparent early-stage uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Jvan Casarin; Giorgio Bogani; Elisa Piovano; Francesca Falcone; Federico Ferrari; Franco Odicino; Andrea Puppo; Ferdinando Bonfiglio; Nicoletta Donadello; Ciro Pinelli; Antonio Simone Laganà; Antonino Ditto; Mario Malzoni; Stefano Greggi; Francesco Raspagliesi; Fabio Ghezzi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.