Literature DB >> 19353259

Spatial and temporal jitter distort estimated functional properties of visual sensory neurons.

Alexander G Dimitrov1, Melissa A Sheiko, Jonathan Baker, Shih-Cheng Yen.   

Abstract

The functional properties of neural sensory cells or small neural ensembles are often characterized by analyzing response-conditioned stimulus ensembles. Many widely used analytical methods, like receptive fields (RF), Wiener kernels or spatio-temporal receptive fields (STRF), rely on simple statistics of those ensembles. They also tend to rely on simple noise models for the residuals of the conditional ensembles. However, in many cases the response-conditioned stimulus set has more complex structure. If not taken explicitly into account, it can bias the estimates of many simple statistics, and lead to erroneous conclusions about the functionality of a neural sensory system. In this article, we consider sensory noise in the visual system generated by small stimulus shifts in two dimensions (2 spatial or 1-space 1-time jitter). We model this noise as the action of a set of translations onto the stimulus that leave the response invariant. The analysis demonstrates that the spike-triggered average is a biased estimator of the model mean, and provides a de-biasing method. We apply this approach to observations from the stimulus/response characteristics of cells in the cat visual cortex and provide improved estimates of the structure of visual receptive fields. In several cases the new estimates differ substantially from the classic receptive fields, to a degree that may require re-evaluation of the functional description of the associated cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19353259     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-009-0144-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  31 in total

1.  Spectro-temporal receptive fields of midbrain auditory neurons in the rat obtained with frequency modulated stimulation.

Authors:  P W Poon; P P Yu
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-07-28       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  A new method for adjusting neural response jitter in the STRF obtained by spike-trigger averaging.

Authors:  Tsai-Rong Chang; Pau-Choo Chung; Tzai-Wen Chiu; Paul Wai-Fung Poon
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Spike-triggered neural characterization.

Authors:  Odelia Schwartz; Jonathan W Pillow; Nicole C Rust; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effects of stimulus transformations on estimates of sensory neuron selectivity.

Authors:  Alexander G Dimitrov; Tomás Gedeon
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Dynamics of receptive field size in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Vikas R Kumar; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Heterogeneity in the responses of adjacent neurons to natural stimuli in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  Shih-Cheng Yen; Jonathan Baker; Charles M Gray
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Adjacent visual cortical complex cells share about 20% of their stimulus-related information.

Authors:  T J Gawne; T W Kjaer; J A Hertz; B J Richmond
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex.

Authors:  D L Ringach; M J Hawken; R Shapley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development.

Authors:  G C DeAngelis; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Receptive field properties of neurones in visual area 1 and visual area 2 in the baboon.

Authors:  H Kennedy; K A Martin; G A Orban; D Whitteridge
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  6 in total

1.  Characterizing responses of translation-invariant neurons to natural stimuli: maximally informative invariant dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Eickenberg; Ryan J Rowekamp; Minjoon Kouh; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Estimating linear-nonlinear models using Renyi divergences.

Authors:  Minjoon Kouh; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Network       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.273

3.  Two-dimensional adaptation in the auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Katherine I Nagel; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Maximally informative "stimulus energies" in the analysis of neural responses to natural signals.

Authors:  Kanaka Rajan; William Bialek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  How Invariant Feature Selectivity Is Achieved in Cortex.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Front Synaptic Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-23

6.  Dynamic alignment models for neural coding.

Authors:  Sepp Kollmorgen; Richard H R Hahnloser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.