Literature DB >> 19352236

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature: an anatomical study utilizing 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstructions.

Jim Kercher1, John Xerogeanes, Allen Tannenbaum, Ramsey Al-Hakim, James C Black, John Zhao.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has proven to be a reliable method to restore knee stability. However, the risk of physeal arrest with transphyseal tunnel placement in skeletally immature patients has raised concern regarding this technique. Conservative nonoperative management also has its limitations resulting in meniscal and chondral damage that may lead to degenerative joint disease and poor return to sport. Researchers have used animal models to study the threshold of physeal damage producing growth deformity. The purpose of this study was to examine the distal femoral and proximal tibial physes and determine the damage produced by drilling transphyseal tunnels. In addition, we attempted to find a reproducible angle at which to drill the tibial tunnel for safe interference screw placement. To do this, we used a custom software module.
METHODS: A custom software package designed by our team was used: Module for Adolescent ACL Reconstructive Surgery (MAARS). This module created a 3-dimensional model of the distal femur and proximal tibia. The data required for MAARS were sagittal and coronal T1 magnetic resonance imagings of at least 1.5 T. Thirty-one knee magnetic resonance imaging studies from patients aged 10 to 15 years old were used. The physes were segmented out to obtain volumetric measurements. Transphyseal tunnels were simulated based on the anatomic trajectory of the native ACL. The module calculated volume of physis was removed with the use of an 8-mm tunnel and the optimum angle for trajectory.
RESULTS: Average volume of the tibial and femoral physis was 12,683.1 microL and 14,708.3 microL, respectively. The volume increased linearly with age. Average volume removed from the tibial and femoral physis was 318.4 microL and 306.29 microL, respectively. This represented 2.4% of the distal femoral physis and 2.5% of the proximal tibial physis. The volume percent removed decreased linearly with age.Manipulation of the variables demonstrates graft radius is the most critical parameter affecting the volume of physeal injury. Variation of graft diameter from 6 mm to 11 mm will increase volume percent removed from 2.3% to 7.8%, which averages 1.1% for every 1 mm increase. Increasing tunnel drill angle from 45 degrees to 70 degrees will decrease volume percent removed from 4.1% to 3.1% which averages 0.2% removed for each 5 degrees increase in drill angle. The average angle to maintain a distance of 20 mm from the proximal tibial physis was 65 degrees with a range of 40 degrees to 85 degrees. DISCUSSION: Less than 3% injury occurs when drilling an 8-mm tunnel across the physis. A vertical tunnel has minimal effect, but the tunnel diameter is critical. Interference screws can be placed safely to avoid the physis but requires careful planning. The MAARS module may be helpful in preoperative planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19352236      PMCID: PMC3646549          DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181982228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  34 in total

1.  Modeling the growth plates in the pediatric knee: implications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J Guarino; S Tennyson; Y Barrios; K Shea; R Pfeiffer; M Sabick
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of intra-articular and extra-articular procedures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  N A Ramaniraka; P Saunier; O Siegrist; D P Pioletti
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Knee ligament injuries in adolescents. Eight year follow-up of conservative management.

Authors:  P Kannus; M Järvinen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1988-11

4.  Physeal sparing reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature prepubescent children and adolescents. Surgical technique.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; Sumeet Garg; Lyle J Micheli
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The anatomy of the proximal tibia in pediatric and adolescent patients: implications for ACL reconstruction and prevention of physeal arrest.

Authors:  Kevin G Shea; Peter J Apel; Ronald P Pfeiffer; Paul D Traughber
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The influence of transphyseal drilling and tendon grafting on bone growth: an experimental study in the rabbit.

Authors:  P M Janarv; B Wikström; G Hirsch
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Management and complications of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients: survey of the Herodicus Society and The ACL Study Group.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; Hillary S Saxon; W David Hovis; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon allograft in the skeletally immature patient.

Authors:  Robin Fuchs; William Wheatley; John W Uribe; Keith S Hechtman; John E Zvijac; Matthias R Schurhoff
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  The distal femoral and proximal tibial growth plates: MR imaging, three-dimensional modeling and estimation of area and volume.

Authors:  Joseph G Craig; Dianna D Cody; Marnix Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The effect of intra-articular ACL reconstruction on the growth plates of rabbits.

Authors:  V Guzzanti; F Falciglia; A Gigante; C Fabbriciani
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-11
View more
  20 in total

1.  A comparison of revision and rerupture rates of ACL reconstruction between autografts and allografts in the skeletally immature.

Authors:  Ian R Nelson; Jason Chen; Rebecca Love; Brent R Davis; Gregory B Maletis; Tadashi T Funahashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  All-epiphyseal, all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique for skeletally immature patients.

Authors:  Moira M McCarthy; Jessica Graziano; Daniel W Green; Frank A Cordasco
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2012-11-22

Review 3.  Pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes.

Authors:  Devin C Peterson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

4.  Reliability of 3D localisation of ACL attachments on MRI: comparison using multi-planar 2D versus high-resolution 3D base sequences.

Authors:  Vimarsha Gopal Swami; June Cheng-Baron; Catherine Hui; Richard B Thompson; Jacob Lester Jaremko
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anatomical "C"-shaped double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in pre-adolescent children with open growth plates.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Tsuyoshi Takada; Sven Feil; Carmen Dietrich; Shaun K Stinton; Thomas P Branch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Valgus and flexion deformity after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in a skeletally immature patient.

Authors:  Henri Emile Robert; Charles Casin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament injury diagnosis and management in a pediatric patient: a case report.

Authors:  Charles Hazle; Cherie Duby
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-12

8.  Paediatric ACL repair reinforced with temporary internal bracing.

Authors:  James O Smith; Sam K Yasen; Harry C Palmer; Breck R Lord; Edward M Britton; Adrian J Wilson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Combined posterolateral corner and acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries in an adolescent cohort: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth Aaron Shaw; Brian S Dunoski; Neil J Mardis; Donna M Pacicca
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Anatomic, Transepiphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyle E Hammond; John W Xerogeanes; Dane C Todd
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2013-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.