Literature DB >> 19349870

Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir and 2 nucleosides for maintenance therapy of HIV: 96-week analysis.

Jose R Arribas1, Rafael Delgado, Alberto Arranz, Rosa Muñoz, Joaquin Portilla, Juan Pasquau, María J Pérez-Elias, Jose A Iribarren, Rafael Rubio, Antonio Ocampo, Matilde Sánchez-Conde, Hernando Knobel, Piedad Arazo, Jesús Sanz, José López-Aldeguer, María L Montes, Federico Pulido.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The OK04 trial has shown that 48 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy with reintroduction of nucleosides as needed was noninferior to continuation of triple therapy with 2 nucleosides and lopinavir-ritonavir in patients with prior stable suppression. However, it is still uncertain if this experimental strategy can maintain suppression in the long term.
METHODS: Patients entered this noninferiority trial (upper limit 95% confidence interval: +12%) with no history of virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor and receiving 2 nucleosides plus lopinavir/ritonavir, with HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter for more than 6 months. Primary end point was percent of patients without therapeutic failure, defined as confirmed HIV RNA >500 copies per milliliter with exclusion of monotherapy patients who resuppressed to <50 copies per milliliter after resuming baseline nucleosides, or loss to follow-up, or change of randomized therapy other than reinduction.
RESULTS: Through 96 weeks, percentage of patient without therapeutic failure was 87% (monotherapy, n = 100) vs. 78% (triple therapy, n = 98; 95% confidence interval: -20% to +1.2%). Percentage with HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter (intention to treat, missing = failure, reinduction = failure): 77% (monotherapy) vs. 78% (triple therapy). Low-level viral rebound was more frequent in the monotherapy group. Twelve patients in the monotherapy group (12%) needed reinduction with nucleosides. Discontinuations due to adverse events were significantly more frequent in the triple therapy group (8%) than in the monotherapy group (0%); P = 0.003.
CONCLUSIONS: At 96-week lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy with reintroduction of nucleosides as needed was noninferior to continuation of triple therapy. Incidence of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was significantly lower with monotherapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114933).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19349870     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a56de5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  34 in total

1.  CYP3A4 polymorphism and lopinavir toxicity in an HIV-infected pregnant woman.

Authors:  Elena López Aspiroz; Salvador Enrique Cabrera Figueroa; Alicia Iglesias Gómez; María Paz Valverde Merino; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil Hurlé
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Protease inhibitor monotherapy: what is its role?

Authors:  Miriam Estébanez; Jose R Arribas
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  Single genome sequencing of HIV-1 gag and protease resistance mutations at virologic failure during the OK04 trial of simplified versus standard maintenance therapy.

Authors:  John E McKinnon; Rafael Delgado; Federico Pulido; Wei Shao; Jose R Arribas; John W Mellors
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2011

4.  Detection of HIV-1 at between 20 and 49 copies per milliliter by the Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 v2.0 assay is associated with higher pretherapy viral load and less time on antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  José F Pascual-Pareja; Lorena Martínez-Prats; Joanna Luczkowiak; Silvana Fiorante; Rafael Rubio; Federico Pulido; Joaquín R Otero; Rafael Delgado
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy after virologic failure of first-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  John A Bartlett; Heather J Ribaudo; Carole L Wallis; Evgenia Aga; David A Katzenstein; Wendy S Stevens; Michael R Norton; Karin L Klingman; Mina C Hosseinipour; John A Crump; Khuanchai Supparatpinyo; Sharlaa Badal-Faesen; Beatrice A Kallungal; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 6.  Emergence of HIV drug resistance during first- and second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Mina C Hosseinipour; Ravindra K Gupta; Gert Van Zyl; Joseph J Eron; Jean B Nachega
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Low lopinavir plasma or hair concentrations explain second-line protease inhibitor failures in a resource-limited setting.

Authors:  Gert Uves van Zyl; Thijs E van Mens; Helen McIlleron; Michele Zeier; Jean B Nachega; Eric Decloedt; Carolina Malavazzi; Peter Smith; Yong Huang; Lize van der Merwe; Monica Gandhi; Gary Maartens
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 8.  Novel antiretroviral combinations in treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection: rationale and results.

Authors:  Babafemi Taiwo; Robert L Murphy; Christine Katlama
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  CSF penetration by antiretroviral drugs.

Authors:  Christine Eisfeld; Doris Reichelt; Stefan Evers; Ingo Husstedt
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  Potential for simplification of HIV treatment with boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy.

Authors:  Elena Reina; Ramón San Miguel; Natalia Larrea; Patricia Garcia; Victor Napal
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.