BACKGROUND: Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/RTV) alone has been evaluated as simplified maintenance therapy for HIV-1 infection, but there are concerns about greater potential for emergence of protease inhibitor (PI) resistance. The OK04 trial evaluated maintenance therapy with LPV/RTV alone versus standard therapy (ST) with two NRTIs plus LPV/RTV in 205 patients, of whom 15 had virological rebound by week 48 (11 versus 4 patients, respectively). We developed a single genome sequencing (SGS) assay of HIV-1 gag and protease to assess the emergence of low frequency drug-resistant variants during virological rebound. METHODS: Plasma samples from 15 subjects at virological rebound were analysed by SGS of HIV-1 gag and protease genes. A total of 45 SGS sequences were planned per sample, providing 90% power to detect variants comprising >5% of the virus population. RESULTS: Overall, 521 single sequences obtained from 13 patients (range 4-48 sequences/patient) revealed similar frequencies of major protease resistance mutations in samples from the LPV/RTV alone (3/11) and ST (3/4) arms (P=0.10), with a median number of minor protease resistance mutations of 3.0 versus 3.5, respectively (P=0.23). Median number of gag PI resistance mutations were similar between the LPV/RTV alone and ST arms at cleavage sites (3.0 versus 2.5; P=0.83), non-cleavage sites (21 versus 16.5; P=0.71) and the transframe protein-p6 pol region cleavage sites (4.0 versus 3.0; P=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Although more subjects with simplified maintenance therapy with LPV/RTV alone had virological rebound compared to the ST arm, this was not associated with more frequent emergence of variants encoding PI resistance mutations in gag or protease detected by SGS.
BACKGROUND:Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/RTV) alone has been evaluated as simplified maintenance therapy for HIV-1 infection, but there are concerns about greater potential for emergence of protease inhibitor (PI) resistance. The OK04 trial evaluated maintenance therapy with LPV/RTV alone versus standard therapy (ST) with two NRTIs plus LPV/RTV in 205 patients, of whom 15 had virological rebound by week 48 (11 versus 4 patients, respectively). We developed a single genome sequencing (SGS) assay of HIV-1 gag and protease to assess the emergence of low frequency drug-resistant variants during virological rebound. METHODS: Plasma samples from 15 subjects at virological rebound were analysed by SGS of HIV-1 gag and protease genes. A total of 45 SGS sequences were planned per sample, providing 90% power to detect variants comprising >5% of the virus population. RESULTS: Overall, 521 single sequences obtained from 13 patients (range 4-48 sequences/patient) revealed similar frequencies of major protease resistance mutations in samples from the LPV/RTV alone (3/11) and ST (3/4) arms (P=0.10), with a median number of minor protease resistance mutations of 3.0 versus 3.5, respectively (P=0.23). Median number of gagPI resistance mutations were similar between the LPV/RTV alone and ST arms at cleavage sites (3.0 versus 2.5; P=0.83), non-cleavage sites (21 versus 16.5; P=0.71) and the transframe protein-p6 pol region cleavage sites (4.0 versus 3.0; P=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Although more subjects with simplified maintenance therapy with LPV/RTV alone had virological rebound compared to the ST arm, this was not associated with more frequent emergence of variants encoding PI resistance mutations in gag or protease detected by SGS.
Authors: Jens Verheyen; Elena Litau; Tobias Sing; Martin Däumer; Melanie Balduin; Mark Oette; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Ulrike Schuldenzucker; Daniel Hoffmann; Herbert Pfister; Rolf Kaiser Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2006
Authors: Bruce R Schackman; Callie A Scott; Paul E Sax; Elena Losina; Timothy J Wilkin; John E McKinnon; Susan Swindells; Milton C Weinstein; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Federico Pulido; José R Arribas; Rafael Delgado; Esther Cabrero; Juan González-García; María J Pérez-Elias; Alberto Arranz; Joaquín Portilla; Juan Pasquau; José A Iribarren; Rafael Rubio; Michael Norton Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-01-11 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: D William Cameron; Barbara A da Silva; Jose R Arribas; Robert A Myers; Nicholaos C Bellos; Norbert Gilmore; Martin S King; Barry M Bernstein; Scott C Brun; George J Hanna Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: W M El-Sadr; J D Lundgren; J D Neaton; F Gordin; D Abrams; R C Arduino; A Babiker; W Burman; N Clumeck; C J Cohen; D Cohn; D Cooper; J Darbyshire; S Emery; G Fätkenheuer; B Gazzard; B Grund; J Hoy; K Klingman; M Losso; N Markowitz; J Neuhaus; A Phillips; C Rappoport Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nicholas I Paton; Wolfgang Stöhr; Alejandro Arenas-Pinto; Martin Fisher; Ian Williams; Margaret Johnson; Chloe Orkin; Fabian Chen; Vincent Lee; Alan Winston; Mark Gompels; Julie Fox; Karen Scott; David T Dunn Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Katherine A Sutherland; Dami A Collier; Daniel T Claiborne; Jessica L Prince; Martin J Deymier; Richard A Goldstein; Eric Hunter; Ravindra K Gupta Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: David T Dunn; Wolfgang Stöhr; Alejandro Arenas-Pinto; Anna Tostevin; Jean L Mbisa; Nicholas I Paton Journal: J Clin Virol Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Yang Li; Leilei Han; Yanglan Wang; Xiaolin Wang; Lei Jia; Jingyun Li; Jingwan Han; Jin Zhao; Hanping Li; Lin Li Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 6.064