OBJECTIVE: Bevacizumab has been shown to be effective in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma in combination with chemotherapy compared with historic controls but not in randomized trials. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated for recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab vs a control group of patients, comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups, and performed subgroup analysis based on age and performance status. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) based on age was examined using DNA microarray analysis. We also evaluated the impact of bevacizumab on quality of life. RESULTS: We identified 44 patients who received bevacizumab and 79 patients who had not been treated with bevacizumab. There was a significant improvement in PFS and OS in the bevacizumab-treated group. Patients of older age (> or =55 years) and poor performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status < or =80) had significantly better PFS when treated with bevacizumab, and bevacizumab-treated older patients had significantly increased OS. VEGF expression was significantly higher in older glioblastoma patients (aged > or =55 years). Patients treated with bevacizumab also required less dexamethasone use and maintained their functional status longer than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy may be a more effective treatment for recurrent glioblastoma and warrants further randomized prospective studies to determine its effect on survival. Bevacizumab also has more effect in those with older age and might reflect biologic differences in glioblastoma in different age groups as seen with the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor.
OBJECTIVE:Bevacizumab has been shown to be effective in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma in combination with chemotherapy compared with historic controls but not in randomized trials. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated for recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab vs a control group of patients, comparing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups, and performed subgroup analysis based on age and performance status. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) based on age was examined using DNA microarray analysis. We also evaluated the impact of bevacizumab on quality of life. RESULTS: We identified 44 patients who received bevacizumab and 79 patients who had not been treated with bevacizumab. There was a significant improvement in PFS and OS in the bevacizumab-treated group. Patients of older age (> or =55 years) and poor performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status < or =80) had significantly better PFS when treated with bevacizumab, and bevacizumab-treated older patients had significantly increased OS. VEGF expression was significantly higher in older glioblastomapatients (aged > or =55 years). Patients treated with bevacizumab also required less dexamethasone use and maintained their functional status longer than the control group. CONCLUSIONS:Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy may be a more effective treatment for recurrent glioblastoma and warrants further randomized prospective studies to determine its effect on survival. Bevacizumab also has more effect in those with older age and might reflect biologic differences in glioblastoma in different age groups as seen with the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor.
Authors: William A Freije; F Edmundo Castro-Vargas; Zixing Fang; Steve Horvath; Timothy Cloughesy; Linda M Liau; Paul S Mischel; Stanley F Nelson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jeremy N Rich; Christopher Hans; Beatrix Jones; Edwin S Iversen; Roger E McLendon; B K Ahmed Rasheed; Adrian Dobra; Holly K Dressman; Darell D Bigner; Joseph R Nevins; Mike West Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Marc R J Carlson; Whitney B Pope; Steve Horvath; Jerome G Braunstein; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Cho-Lea Tso; Ingo Mellinghoff; Albert Lai; Linda M Liau; Paul S Mischel; Jun Dong; Stanley F Nelson; Timothy F Cloughesy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Heidi S Phillips; Samir Kharbanda; Ruihuan Chen; William F Forrest; Robert H Soriano; Thomas D Wu; Anjan Misra; Janice M Nigro; Howard Colman; Liliana Soroceanu; P Mickey Williams; Zora Modrusan; Burt G Feuerstein; Ken Aldape Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; David A Reardon; Jennifer A Quinn; Jeremy N Rich; Sith Sathornsumetee; Sridharan Gururangan; John Sampson; Melissa Wagner; Leighann Bailey; Darell D Bigner; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; David A Reardon; John F de Groot; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller; Markus Weiler; Tracy Batchelor; Alfred W K Yung; Michael Platten Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Arti Hurria; Ilene S Browner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Mollie deShazo; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Jimmie C Holland; Holly M Holmes; Mohana B Karlekar; Nancy L Keating; June McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen H Petersdorf; Hope S Rugo; Rebecca A Silliman; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Alva B Weir; Tanya Wildes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Benedikt Wiestler; Alexander Radbruch; Matthias Osswald; Stephanie E Combs; Christine Jungk; Frank Winkler; Martin Bendszus; Andreas Unterberg; Michael Platten; Wolfgang Wick; Antje Wick Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.130