Literature DB >> 19349301

A novel mechanism of antagonism between ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes regulates RNR3 expression.

Raghuvir S Tomar1, James N Psathas, Hesheng Zhang, Zhengjian Zhang, Joseph C Reese.   

Abstract

Gene expression depends upon the antagonistic actions of chromatin remodeling complexes. While this has been studied extensively for the enzymes that covalently modify the tails of histones, the mechanism of how ATP-dependent remodeling complexes antagonize each other to maintain the proper level of gene activity is not known. The gene encoding a large subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, RNR3, is regulated by ISW2 and SWI/SNF, complexes that repress and activate transcription, respectively. Here, we studied the functional interactions of these two complexes at RNR3. Deletion of ISW2 causes constitutive recruitment of SWI/SNF, and conditional reexpression of ISW2 causes the repositioning of nucleosomes and reduced SWI/SNF occupancy at RNR3. Thus, ISW2 is required for restriction of access of SWI/SNF to the RNR3 promoter under the uninduced condition. Interestingly, the binding of sequence-specific DNA binding factors and the general transcription machinery are unaffected by the status of ISW2, suggesting that disruption of nucleosome positioning does not cause a nonspecific increase in cross-linking of all factors to RNR3. We provide evidence that ISW2 does not act on SWI/SNF directly but excludes its occupancy by positioning nucleosomes over the promoter. Genetic disruption of nucleosome positioning by other means led to a similar phenotype, linking repressed chromatin structure to SWI/SNF exclusion. Thus, incorporation of promoters into a repressive chromatin structure is essential for prevention of the opportunistic actions of nucleosome-disrupting activities in vivo, providing a novel mechanism for maintaining tight control of gene expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19349301      PMCID: PMC2698743          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01741-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  53 in total

1.  Two functionally distinct forms of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex, containing essential AT hook, BAH, and bromodomains.

Authors:  B R Cairns; A Schlichter; H Erdjument-Bromage; P Tempst; R D Kornberg; F Winston
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  In vivo chromatin remodeling by yeast ISWI homologs Isw1p and Isw2p.

Authors:  N A Kent; N Karabetsou; P K Politis; J Mellor
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  The Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex represses early meiotic genes upon recruitment by Ume6p.

Authors:  J P Goldmark; T G Fazzio; P W Estep; G M Church; T Tsukiyama
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-10-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Cooperation between complexes that regulate chromatin structure and transcription.

Authors:  Geeta J Narlikar; Hua-Ying Fan; Robert E Kingston
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Histone acetyltransferases.

Authors:  S Y Roth; J M Denu; C D Allis
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 23.643

6.  PCR-based engineering of yeast genome.

Authors:  Marie E Petracek; Mark S Longtine
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Ssn6-Tup1 regulates RNR3 by positioning nucleosomes and affecting the chromatin structure at the upstream repression sequence.

Authors:  B Li; J C Reese
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  The chromo domain protein chd1p from budding yeast is an ATP-dependent chromatin-modifying factor.

Authors:  H G Tran; D J Steger; V R Iyer; A D Johnson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  Promoter targeting of chromatin-modifying complexes.

Authors:  A H Hassan; K E Neely; M Vignali; J C Reese; J L Workman
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2001-09-01

10.  Histone deacetylases RPD3 and HOS2 regulate the transcriptional activation of DNA damage-inducible genes.

Authors:  Vishva Mitra Sharma; Raghuvir S Tomar; Alison E Dempsey; Joseph C Reese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genomic profiling of HMGN1 reveals an association with chromatin at regulatory regions.

Authors:  Suresh Cuddapah; Dustin E Schones; Kairong Cui; Tae-Young Roh; Artem Barski; Gang Wei; Mark Rochman; Michael Bustin; Keji Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  A highly conserved region within H2B is important for FACT to act on nucleosomes.

Authors:  Suting Zheng; J Brooks Crickard; Abhinaya Srikanth; Joseph C Reese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Set2-dependent K36 methylation is regulated by novel intratail interactions within H3.

Authors:  James N Psathas; Suting Zheng; Song Tan; Joseph C Reese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Chromatin and transcription in yeast.

Authors:  Oliver J Rando; Fred Winston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Tension-dependent nucleosome remodeling at the pericentromere in yeast.

Authors:  Jolien S Verdaasdonk; Ryan Gardner; Andrew D Stephens; Elaine Yeh; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Tup1 stabilizes promoter nucleosome positioning and occupancy at transcriptionally plastic genes.

Authors:  Jason M Rizzo; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Michael J Buck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The chromatin remodelers RSC and ISW1 display functional and chromatin-based promoter antagonism.

Authors:  Timothy J Parnell; Alisha Schlichter; Boris G Wilson; Bradley R Cairns
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 8.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.