Literature DB >> 19348775

Absolute quantitation of bacterial biofilm adhesion and viscoelasticity by microbead force spectroscopy.

Peter C Y Lau1, John R Dutcher, Terry J Beveridge, Joseph S Lam.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms are the most prevalent mode of bacterial growth in nature. Adhesive and viscoelastic properties of bacteria play important roles at different stages of biofilm development. Following irreversible attachment of bacterial cells onto a surface, a biofilm can grow in which its matrix viscoelasticity helps to maintain structural integrity, determine stress resistance, and control ease of dispersion. In this study, a novel application of force spectroscopy was developed to characterize the surface adhesion and viscoelasticity of bacterial cells in biofilms. By performing microbead force spectroscopy with a closed-loop atomic force microscope, we accurately quantified these properties over a defined contact area. Using the model gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we observed that the adhesive and viscoelastic properties of an isogenic lipopolysaccharide mutant wapR biofilm were significantly different from those measured for the wild-type strain PAO1 biofilm. Moreover, biofilm maturation in either strain also led to prominent changes in adhesion and viscoelasticity. To minimize variability in force measurements resulting from experimental parameter changes, we developed standardized conditions for microbead force spectroscopy to enable meaningful comparison of data obtained in different experiments. Force plots measured under standard conditions showed that the adhesive pressures of PAO1 and wapR early biofilms were 34 +/- 15 Pa and 332 +/- 47 Pa, respectively, whereas those of PAO1 and wapR mature biofilms were 19 +/- 7 Pa and 80 +/- 22 Pa, respectively. Fitting of creep data to a Voigt Standard Linear Solid viscoelasticity model revealed that the instantaneous and delayed elastic moduli in P. aeruginosa were drastically reduced by lipopolysaccharide deficiency and biofilm maturation, whereas viscosity was decreased only for biofilm maturation. In conclusion, we have introduced a direct biophysical method for simultaneously quantifying adhesion and viscoelasticity in bacterial biofilms under native conditions. This method could prove valuable for elucidating the contribution of genetic backgrounds, growth conditions, and environmental stresses to microbial community physiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19348775      PMCID: PMC2711294          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  38 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Atomic force microscope.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1986-03-03       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Direct surface force measurement in water using a nanosize colloidal probe technique.

Authors:  Jeong-Min Cho; Wolfgang M Sigmund
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 8.128

4.  Deformation and nano-rheology of red blood cells: an AFM investigation.

Authors:  Kristen E Bremmell; Allan Evans; Clive A Prestidge
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 5.268

5.  Does water activity rule P. mirabilis periodic swarming? II. Viscoelasticity and water balance during swarming.

Authors:  Elodie Lahaye; Thierry Aubry; Vincent Fleury; Olivier Sire
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 6.988

6.  Viscoelasticity of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in response to fluid shear allows resistance to detachment and facilitates rolling migration.

Authors:  Cory J Rupp; Christoph A Fux; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effects of cell surface damage on surface properties and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  G M Bruinsma; M Rustema-Abbing; H C van der Mei; H J Busscher
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.363

8.  The role of the biofilm matrix in structural development.

Authors:  N G Cogan; James P Keener
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Functional characterization of MigA and WapR: putative rhamnosyltransferases involved in outer core oligosaccharide biosynthesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Karen K H Poon; Erin L Westman; Evgeny Vinogradov; Shouguang Jin; Joseph S Lam
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Quantifying the adhesion and interaction forces between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and natural organic matter.

Authors:  Laila I Abu-Lail; Yatao Liu; Arzu Atabek; Terri A Camesano
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  40 in total

1.  Mass transfer enhancement in moving biofilm structures.

Authors:  Danial Taherzadeh; Cristian Picioreanu; Harald Horn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A detailed guideline for the fabrication of single bacterial probes used for atomic force spectroscopy.

Authors:  Nicolas Thewes; Peter Loskill; Christian Spengler; Sebastian Hümbert; Markus Bischoff; Karin Jacobs
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 1.890

3.  Localized removal of layers of metal, polymer, or biomaterial by ultrasound cavitation bubbles.

Authors:  David Fernandez Rivas; Bram Verhaagen; James R T Seddon; Aaldert G Zijlstra; Lei-Meng Jiang; Luc W M van der Sluis; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse; Han J G E Gardeniers
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Bacillus subtilis spreads by surfing on waves of surfactant.

Authors:  Thomas E Angelini; Marcus Roper; Roberto Kolter; David A Weitz; Michael P Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mapping of bacterial biofilm local mechanics by magnetic microparticle actuation.

Authors:  Olivier Galy; Patricia Latour-Lambert; Kais Zrelli; Jean-Marc Ghigo; Christophe Beloin; Nelly Henry
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Modelling mechanical characteristics of microbial biofilms by network theory.

Authors:  Alexander E Ehret; Markus Böl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Response of Simulated Drinking Water Biofilm Mechanical and Structural Properties to Long-Term Disinfectant Exposure.

Authors:  Yun Shen; Conghui Huang; Guillermo L Monroy; Dao Janjaroen; Nicolas Derlon; Jie Lin; Rosa Espinosa-Marzal; Eberhard Morgenroth; Stephen A Boppart; Nicholas J Ashbolt; Wen-Tso Liu; Thanh H Nguyen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Remote magnetic actuation of micrometric probes for in situ 3D mapping of bacterial biofilm physical properties.

Authors:  Olivier Galy; Kais Zrelli; Patricia Latour-Lambert; Lyndsey Kirwan; Nelly Henry
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  A microfluidic method and custom model for continuous, non-intrusive biofilm viscosity measurements under different nutrient conditions.

Authors:  J Greener; M Parvinzadeh Gashti; A Eslami; M P Zarabadi; S M Taghavi
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  Differential lipopolysaccharide core capping leads to quantitative and correlated modifications of mechanical and structural properties in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Peter C Y Lau; Theresa Lindhout; Terry J Beveridge; John R Dutcher; Joseph S Lam
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.