Literature DB >> 26756120

Response of Simulated Drinking Water Biofilm Mechanical and Structural Properties to Long-Term Disinfectant Exposure.

Yun Shen, Conghui Huang, Guillermo L Monroy, Dao Janjaroen, Nicolas Derlon1, Jie Lin, Rosa Espinosa-Marzal, Eberhard Morgenroth1,2, Stephen A Boppart, Nicholas J Ashbolt3, Wen-Tso Liu, Thanh H Nguyen.   

Abstract

Mechanical and structural properties of biofilms influence the accumulation and release of pathogens in drinking water distribution systems (DWDS). Thus, understanding how long-term residual disinfectants exposure affects biofilm mechanical and structural properties is a necessary aspect for pathogen risk assessment and control. In this study, elastic modulus and structure of groundwater biofilms was monitored by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) during three months of exposure to monochloramine or free chlorine. After the first month of disinfectant exposure, the mean stiffness of monochloramine- or free-chlorine-treated biofilms was 4 to 9 times higher than those before treatment. Meanwhile, the biofilm thickness decreased from 120 ± 8 μm to 93 ± 6-107 ± 11 μm. The increased surface stiffness and decreased biofilm thickness within the first month of disinfectant exposure was presumably due to the consumption of biomass. However, by the second to third month during disinfectant exposure, the biofilm mean stiffness showed a 2- to 4-fold decrease, and the biofilm thickness increased to 110 ± 7-129 ± 8 μm, suggesting that the biofilms adapted to disinfectant exposure. After three months of the disinfectant exposure process, the disinfected biofilms showed 2-5 times higher mean stiffness (as determined by AFM) and 6-13-fold higher ratios of protein over polysaccharide, as determined by differential staining and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), than the nondisinfected groundwater biofilms. However, the disinfected biofilms and nondisinfected biofilms showed statistically similar thicknesses (t test, p > 0.05), suggesting that long-term disinfection may not significantly remove net biomass. This study showed how biofilm mechanical and structural properties vary in response to a complex DWDS environment, which will contribute to further research on the risk assessment and control of biofilm-associated-pathogens in DWDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26756120      PMCID: PMC5135099          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  55 in total

1.  Experimental reproducibility in flow-chamber biofilms.

Authors:  A Heydorn; B K Ersbøll; M Hentzer; M R Parsek; M Givskov; S Molin
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Quantifying the tensile strength of microbial mats grown over noncohesive sediments.

Authors:  E Vignaga; H Haynes; W T Sloan
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Predation influences the structure of biofilm developed on ultrafiltration membranes.

Authors:  Nicolas Derlon; Maryna Peter-Varbanets; Andreas Scheidegger; Wouter Pronk; Eberhard Morgenroth
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Effects of culture conditions and biofilm formation on the iodine susceptibility of Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  K L Cargill; B H Pyle; R L Sauer; G A McFeters
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Biofilm detachment mechanisms in a liquid-fluidized bed.

Authors:  H T Chang; B E Rittmann; D Amar; R Heim; O Ehlinger; Y Lesty
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1991-08-20       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Applying the digital image correlation method to estimate the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms subjected to a wall shear stress.

Authors:  J D Mathias; P Stoodley
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.209

7.  Free chlorine and monochloramine application to nitrifying biofilm: comparison of biofilm penetration, activity, and viability.

Authors:  Woo Hyoung Lee; David G Wahman; Paul L Bishop; Jonathan G Pressman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  A novel microfluidic device for the in situ optical and mechanical analysis of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Aaron P Mosier; Alain E Kaloyeros; Nathaniel C Cady
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.363

9.  Material modeling of biofilm mechanical properties.

Authors:  C S Laspidou; L A Spyrou; N Aravas; B E Rittmann
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.144

10.  Drinking water biofilm cohesiveness changes under chlorination or hydrodynamic stress.

Authors:  L Mathieu; I Bertrand; Y Abe; E Angel; J C Block; S Skali-Lami; G Francius
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 11.236

View more
  9 in total

1.  Dynamics of the physiochemical and community structures of biofilms under the influence of algal organic matter and humic substances.

Authors:  Lei Li; Youchul Jeon; Sang-Hoon Lee; Hodon Ryu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Youngwoo Seo
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Effect of temperature and colonization of Legionella pneumophila and Vermamoeba vermiformis on bacterial community composition of copper drinking water biofilms.

Authors:  Helen Y Buse; Pan Ji; Vicente Gomez-Alvarez; Amy Pruden; Marc A Edwards; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 5.813

3.  Removal of Foodborne Pathogen Biofilms by Acidic Electrolyzed Water.

Authors:  Qiao Han; Xueying Song; Zhaohuan Zhang; Jiaojiao Fu; Xu Wang; Pradeep K Malakar; Haiquan Liu; Yingjie Pan; Yong Zhao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Bacterial Density and Biofilm Structure Determined by Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Jiapeng Hou; Can Wang; René T Rozenbaum; Niar Gusnaniar; Ed D de Jong; Willem Woudstra; Gésinda I Geertsema-Doornbusch; Jelly Atema-Smit; Jelmer Sjollema; Yijin Ren; Henk J Busscher; Henny C van der Mei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Antibiofilm and Antiquorum Sensing Potential of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Z057 against Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

Authors:  Xiangpeng Han; Qingying Chen; Xingguo Zhang; Xiaolan Chen; Dongsheng Luo; Qingping Zhong
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-27

6.  Long-Term Effects of Residual Chlorine on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Simulated Drinking Water Fed With Low AOC Medium.

Authors:  Guannan Mao; Yuhao Song; Mark Bartlam; Yingying Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Disintegration of simulated drinking water biofilms with arrays of microchannel plasma jets.

Authors:  Peter P Sun; Elbashir M Araud; Conghui Huang; Yun Shen; Guillermo L Monroy; Shengyun Zhong; Zikang Tong; Stephen A Boppart; J Gary Eden; Thanh H Nguyen
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 7.290

8.  Effect of divalent ions and a polyphosphate on composition, structure, and stiffness of simulated drinking water biofilms.

Authors:  Yun Shen; Pin Chieh Huang; Conghui Huang; Peng Sun; Guillermo L Monroy; Wenjing Wu; Jie Lin; Rosa M Espinosa-Marzal; Stephen A Boppart; Wen-Tso Liu; Thanh H Nguyen
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 7.290

9.  Characterization of Mixed-Species Biofilm Formed by Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Ping Chen; Jing Jing Wang; Bin Hong; Ling Tan; Jun Yan; Zhaohuan Zhang; Haiquan Liu; Yingjie Pan; Yong Zhao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.