Literature DB >> 19348156

Word length and lexical competition: longer is the same as shorter.

Michael S Vitevitch1, Melissa K Stamer, Joan A Sereno.   

Abstract

Neighborhood density refers to the number of words that sound similar to a given word. Previous studies have found that neighborhood density influences the recognition of spoken words (Luce & Pisoni, 1998); however, this work has focused almost exclusively on monosyllabic words in English. To investigate the effects of neighborhood density on longer words, bisyllabic words varying in neighborhood density were presented auditorily to participants in a perceptual identification task and a lexical decision task. In the perceptual identification task, words with sparse neighborhoods were more accurately identified than words with dense neighborhoods. In the lexical decision task, words with sparse neighborhoods were responded to more quickly and more accurately than words with dense neighborhoods. These results are similar to those found in studies examining the influence of neighborhood density on the recognition of monosyllabic words in English. In order to better understand lexical processing, models of spoken word recognition must account for the processing of words of all types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19348156     DOI: 10.1177/0023830908099070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  9 in total

1.  Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors.

Authors:  Lidia Suárez; Seok Hui Tan; Melvin J Yap; Winston D Goh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

2.  The Aging Neighborhood: Phonological Density in Naming.

Authors:  Jean K Gordon; Jake C Kurczek
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

3.  Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language.

Authors:  Melissa K Stamer; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2012-07-01

4.  The influence of memory on the speech-to-song illusion.

Authors:  Lauren E Soehlke; Ashwini Kamat; Nichol Castro; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-01-26

5.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Kit Ying Chan; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Insights into failed lexical retrieval from network science.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Kit Ying Chan; Rutherford Goldstein
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  What do foreign neighbors say about the mental lexicon?

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2011-04-07

8.  Phonological codes constrain output of orthographic codes via sublexical and lexical routes in Chinese written production.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Qingfang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An account of the Speech-to-Song Illusion using Node Structure Theory.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Joshua M Mendoza; Elizabeth C Tampke; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.