Literature DB >> 19347407

Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study.

Vivian E Strong1, Nicolas Devaud, Peter J Allen, Mithat Gonen, Murray F Brennan, Daniel Coit.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare technical feasibility and oncologic efficacy of totally laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma is emerging in the West as a technique that may offer benefits for patients, although large-scale studies are lacking.
METHODS: This study was designed as a case-controlled study from a prospective gastric cancer database. Thirty consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma were compared with 30 patients undergoing open subtotal gastrectomy. Controls were matched for stage, age, and gender via a statistically generated selection of all gastrectomies performed during the same period of time. Patient demographics, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, histologic features, location of tumor, lymph node retrieval, recurrence, margins, and early and late postoperative complications were compared.
RESULTS: Tumor location and histology were similar between the two groups. Median operative time for the laparoscopic approach was 270 min (range 150-485 min) compared with median of 126 min (range 85-205 min) in the open group (p < 0.01). Hospital length of stay after laparoscopic gastrectomy was 5 days (range 2-26 days), compared with 7 days (range 5-30 days) in the open group (p = 0.01). Postoperative pain, as measured by number of days of IV narcotic use, was significantly lower for laparoscopic patients, with a median of 3 days (range 0-11 days) compared with 4 days (range 1-13 days) in the open group (p < 0.01). Postoperative early complications trended towards a decrease for laparoscopic versus open surgery patients (p = 0.07); however, there were significantly more late complications for the open group (p = 0.03). Short-term recurrence-free survival and margin status was similar between the two groups (p = not significant) with adequate lymph node retrieval in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma is comparable to the open approach with regard to oncologic principles of resection, with equivalent margin status and adequate lymph node retrieval, demonstrating technically feasibility and equivalent short-term recurrence-free survival. Additional benefits of decreased postoperative complications, decreased length of hospital stay, and decreased narcotic use make this a preferable approach for selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19347407     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0386-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  76 in total

1.  Minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a pilot series.

Authors:  Evelyn L Kachikwu; Vijay Trisal; Joseph Kim; Alessio Pigazzi; Joshua D I Ellenhorn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a monoinstitutional Western center experience.

Authors:  Elena Orsenigo; Saverio Di Palo; Andrea Tamburini; Carlo Staudacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Totally laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy with a novel, safe, simple, and time-saving anastomosis by only stapling devices.

Authors:  Jianjun Du; Jianbo Shuang; Jipeng Li; Qingchuan Zhao; Liu Hong; Xiongwei Du; Jiazhi Wen; Jin Hua
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Comparative study of laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy in gastric cancer management.

Authors:  Giuseppe S Sica; Edoardo Iaculli; Livia Biancone; Sara Di Carlo; Rosa Scaramuzzo; Cristina Fiorani; Paolo Gentileschi; Achille L Gaspari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Totally intracorporeal laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios H Roukos; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703).

Authors:  Hitoshi Katai; Mitsuru Sasako; Haruhiko Fukuda; Kenichi Nakamura; Naoki Hiki; Makoto Saka; Hiroki Yamaue; Takaki Yoshikawa; Kazuyuki Kojima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 8.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Takashi Kosaka; Takashi Oshima; Shoichi Fujii; Ryo Takagawa; Jun Kimura; Hidetaka A Ono; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Masataka Taguri; Satoshi Morita; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of the long-term results of patients who underwent laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee; Byung-Ho Nam; Keun Won Ryu; Seong Yeop Ryu; Young Woo Kim; Young Kyu Park; Sung Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.