STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the baseline relationship of pain intensity, physical impairment, and pain-related fear to shoulder function. BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the influence psychological variable have on function and recovery in individuals with shoulder pathologies. While pain-related fear has been shown to predict disability for patients with low-back and cervical pain, this relationship has not been consistently reported for patients with shoulder pain. METHODS AND MEASURES: One hundred forty-two subjects (78 male, 64 female; mean age, 41.4 years) with nonoperative unilateral shoulder disorders were identified from a clinical database of impairment and outcome measures.Demographic information, duration of symptoms, mechanism of injury, pain intensity, pain-related fear, and range-of-motion (ROM) measures were collected. Self-report of function was measured with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Hierarchical regression analysis determined the proportions of explained variance in function. RESULTS: Demographic variables (duration of symptoms, sex, age, and mechanism of injury) collectively contributed approximately 9% (P=.003) of the variance in function scores. Average pain intensity and flexion ROM contributed an additional 22% (P<.001) of the variance, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) scores contributed an additional 3% (P<.001). In the final parsimonious model, presence of symptoms longer than 3 months (beta=.23, P=.003), pain intensity (beta=.25, P=.002), shoulder flexion ROM index (beta=-.35, P=.001), and kinesiophobia (beta=.17, P=.026) explained 33% of the variance in SPADI function score (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of symptoms longer than 3 months, average pain intensity, flexion ROM index (strongest contributor in multivariate model), and fear-of-pain scores all contributed to baseline shoulder function. The immediate clinical relevance of these findings is unclear but they do provide direction for prospective studies.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the baseline relationship of pain intensity, physical impairment, and pain-related fear to shoulder function. BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the influence psychological variable have on function and recovery in individuals with shoulder pathologies. While pain-related fear has been shown to predict disability for patients with low-back and cervical pain, this relationship has not been consistently reported for patients with shoulder pain. METHODS AND MEASURES: One hundred forty-two subjects (78 male, 64 female; mean age, 41.4 years) with nonoperative unilateral shoulder disorders were identified from a clinical database of impairment and outcome measures.Demographic information, duration of symptoms, mechanism of injury, pain intensity, pain-related fear, and range-of-motion (ROM) measures were collected. Self-report of function was measured with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Hierarchical regression analysis determined the proportions of explained variance in function. RESULTS: Demographic variables (duration of symptoms, sex, age, and mechanism of injury) collectively contributed approximately 9% (P=.003) of the variance in function scores. Average pain intensity and flexion ROM contributed an additional 22% (P<.001) of the variance, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) scores contributed an additional 3% (P<.001). In the final parsimonious model, presence of symptoms longer than 3 months (beta=.23, P=.003), pain intensity (beta=.25, P=.002), shoulder flexion ROM index (beta=-.35, P=.001), and kinesiophobia (beta=.17, P=.026) explained 33% of the variance in SPADI function score (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of symptoms longer than 3 months, average pain intensity, flexion ROM index (strongest contributor in multivariate model), and fear-of-pain scores all contributed to baseline shoulder function. The immediate clinical relevance of these findings is unclear but they do provide direction for prospective studies.
Authors: Alison M Thorpe; Peter B O'Sullivan; Tim Mitchell; Mark Hurworth; Jonathan Spencer; Grant Booth; Sven Goebel; Paul Khoo; Aaron Tay; Anne Smith Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Luis A Feigenbaum; Michael Baraga; Lee D Kaplan; Kathryn E Roach; Kathryn M Calpino; Katie Dorsey; Cristina Martorelli; Beatriz Sagarduy; Lesley-Anne King; Vincent A Scavo Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2015-02
Authors: Rogelio A Coronado; Amee L Seitz; Erica Pelote; Kristin R Archer; Nitin B Jain Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Katherine Hadlandsmyth; Dana L Dailey; Barbara A Rakel; M Bridget Zimmerman; Carol Gt Vance; Ericka N Merriwether; Ruth L Chimenti; Katharine M Geasland; Leslie J Crofford; Kathleen A Sluka Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2017-10-27
Authors: Rachel Chester; Lee Shepstone; Jeremy S Lewis; Christina Jerosch-Herold Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 2.362