OBJECTIVE: Evidence suggests that many individuals with dual diagnosis of mental illness and substance use disorder can be successfully employed in competitive jobs, though there remain barriers and facilitators to consistent work activity in this population. The purpose of this study is to elicit and examine first person accounts of work activity over a 16-year period from people with dual diagnosis, who were not selected for employment readiness or vocational interests. METHODS: 120 people with severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorder participated in this study. Their work activity was self-reported at yearly interviews occurring over a 16-year period. Participants naturally fell into one of four categories: those who (i) never or hardly worked; (ii) worked intermittently; (iii) worked fairly consistently; (iv) worked very consistently. A more in-depth interview occurred at 16 years when participants gave first person accounts of their 16-year work history in answer to open-ended questions. These responses were analyzed using traditional methods of qualitative content analysis, comparing responses across the four categories of work patterns. RESULTS: Five overlapping themes given by participants as strong influences on work activity arose from the data. These are (i) illness management, including use of psychiatric medication and controlling substance abuse; (ii) personal evaluation of the impact of employment; (iii) congruence between job preference and actual employment; (iv) personal motivation and job-seeking assistance, and (v) the conditioning nature of working or not working. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal themes of work activity suggest service improvements consistent with evidence-based supported employment.
OBJECTIVE: Evidence suggests that many individuals with dual diagnosis of mental illness and substance use disorder can be successfully employed in competitive jobs, though there remain barriers and facilitators to consistent work activity in this population. The purpose of this study is to elicit and examine first person accounts of work activity over a 16-year period from people with dual diagnosis, who were not selected for employment readiness or vocational interests. METHODS: 120 people with severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorder participated in this study. Their work activity was self-reported at yearly interviews occurring over a 16-year period. Participants naturally fell into one of four categories: those who (i) never or hardly worked; (ii) worked intermittently; (iii) worked fairly consistently; (iv) worked very consistently. A more in-depth interview occurred at 16 years when participants gave first person accounts of their 16-year work history in answer to open-ended questions. These responses were analyzed using traditional methods of qualitative content analysis, comparing responses across the four categories of work patterns. RESULTS: Five overlapping themes given by participants as strong influences on work activity arose from the data. These are (i) illness management, including use of psychiatric medication and controlling substance abuse; (ii) personal evaluation of the impact of employment; (iii) congruence between job preference and actual employment; (iv) personal motivation and job-seeking assistance, and (v) the conditioning nature of working or not working. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal themes of work activity suggest service improvements consistent with evidence-based supported employment.
Authors: Kelly A Allott; Hok Pan Yuen; Belinda Garner; Sarah Bendall; Eoin J Killackey; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; Christina Phassouliotis; Connie Markulev; Yang Yun; Patrick D McGorry; Lisa J Phillips Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Andrew M Chanen; Katie Nicol; Jennifer K Betts; Gary R Bond; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Henry J Jackson; Katherine N Thompson; Martina Jovev; Hok Pan Yuen; Gina Chinnery; Judith Ring; Kelly Allott; Louise McCutcheon; Ashleigh P Salmon; Eoin Killackey Journal: Trials Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: B Lloyd-Evans; S Marwaha; T Burns; J Secker; E Latimer; R Blizard; H Killaspy; J Totman; S Tanskanen; S Johnson Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 6.892