Literature DB >> 19345719

Parameters modulating the maximum insertion pressure of proteins and peptides in lipid monolayers.

Philippe Calvez1, Sylvain Bussières, Christian Salesse.   

Abstract

The lipid monolayer model membrane is useful for studying the parameters responsible for protein and peptide membrane binding. Different approaches have been used to determine the extent of protein and peptide binding to lipid monolayers. This review focuses on the use of the "maximum insertion pressure" (MIP) to estimate the extent of protein and peptide penetration in lipid monolayers. The MIP data obtained with different proteins and peptides have been reviewed and discussed which allowed to draw conclusions on the parameters modulating the monolayer binding of proteins and peptides. In particular, secondary structure components such as amphipathic alpha-helices of proteins and peptides as well as electrostatic interactions play important roles in monolayer binding. The MIPs have been compared to the estimated lateral pressure of biomembranes which allowed to evaluate the possible association between proteins or peptides with natural membranes. For example, the MIP of a membrane-anchored protein with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) was found to be far below the estimated lateral pressure of biomembranes. This allowed us to conclude that this protein is probably unable to penetrate the membrane and should thus be hanged at the membrane surface by use of its GPI lipid anchor. Moreover, the values of MIP obtained with myristoylated and non-myristoylated forms of calcineurin suggest that the myristoyl group does not contribute to monolayer binding. However, the acylation of a peptide resulted in a large increase of MIP. Finally, the physical state of lipid monolayers can have a strong effect on the values of MIP such that it is preferable to perform measurements with lipids showing a single physical state. Altogether the data show that the measurement of the maximum insertion pressure provides very useful information on the membrane binding properties of proteins and peptides although uncertainties must be provided to make sure the observed differences are significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19345719     DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2009.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochimie        ISSN: 0300-9084            Impact factor:   4.079


  23 in total

1.  Folding and Intramembraneous BRICHOS Binding of the Prosurfactant Protein C Transmembrane Segment.

Authors:  Alejandra Sáenz; Jenny Presto; Patricia Lara; Laura Akinyi-Oloo; Belén García-Fojeda; IngMarie Nilsson; Jan Johansson; Cristina Casals
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Comparison between the behavior of different hydrophobic peptides allowing membrane anchoring of proteins.

Authors:  Mustapha Lhor; Sarah C Bernier; Habib Horchani; Sylvain Bussières; Line Cantin; Bernard Desbat; Christian Salesse
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 12.984

3.  Interfacial tension and surface pressure of high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, and related lipid droplets.

Authors:  O H Samuli Ollila; Antti Lamberg; Maria Lehtivaara; Artturi Koivuniemi; Ilpo Vattulainen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Biophysical methods for the characterization of PTEN/lipid bilayer interactions.

Authors:  Rakesh K Harishchandra; Brittany M Neumann; Arne Gericke; Alonzo H Ross
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 5.  Membrane association of the PTEN tumor suppressor: neutron scattering and MD simulations reveal the structure of protein-membrane complexes.

Authors:  Hirsh Nanda; Frank Heinrich; Mathias Lösche
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  Molecular model for the solubilization of membranes into nanodisks by styrene maleic Acid copolymers.

Authors:  Stefan Scheidelaar; Martijn C Koorengevel; Juan Dominguez Pardo; Johannes D Meeldijk; Eefjan Breukink; J Antoinette Killian
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Insertion of perilipin 3 into a glycero(phospho)lipid monolayer depends on lipid headgroup and acyl chain species.

Authors:  Mona Mirheydari; Sewwandi S Rathnayake; Hannah Frederick; Taylor Arhar; Elizabeth K Mann; Simon Cocklin; Edgar E Kooijman
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 5.922

8.  Structural basis for PI(4)P-specific membrane recruitment of the Legionella pneumophila effector DrrA/SidM.

Authors:  Claudia M Del Campo; Ashwini K Mishra; Yu-Hsiu Wang; Craig R Roy; Paul A Janmey; David G Lambright
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Measuring protein insertion areas in lipid monolayers by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jan Auerswald; Jan Ebenhan; Christian Schwieger; Andrea Scrima; Annette Meister; Kirsten Bacia
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  The role of the disulfide bond in the interaction of islet amyloid polypeptide with membranes.

Authors:  Lucie Khemtémourian; Maarten F M Engel; John A W Kruijtzer; Jo W M Höppener; Rob M J Liskamp; J Antoinette Killian
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 1.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.