Literature DB >> 1934470

Multianalyte microspot immunoassay--microanalytical "compact disk" of the future.

R P Ekins1, F W Chu.   

Abstract

Throughout the 1970s, controversy centered both on immunoassay "sensitivity" per se and on the relative sensitivities of labeled antibody (Ab) and labeled analyte methods. Our theoretical studies revealed that RIA sensitivities could be surpassed only by the use of very high-specificity nonisotopic labels in "noncompetitive" designs, preferably with monoclonal antibodies. The time-resolved fluorescence methodology known as DELFIA--developed in collaboration with LKB/Wallac--represented the first commercial "ultrasensitive" nonisotopic technique based on these theoretical insights, the same concepts being subsequently adopted in comparable methodologies relying on the use of chemiluminescent and enzyme labels. However, high-specific-activity labels also permit the development of "multianalyte" immunoassay systems combining ultrasensitivity with the simultaneous measurement of tens, hundreds, or thousands of analytes in a small biological sample. This possibility relies on simple, albeit hitherto-unexploited, physicochemical concepts. The first is that all immunoassays rely on the measurement of Ab occupancy by analyte. The second is that, provided the Ab concentration used is "vanishingly small," fractional Ab occupancy is independent of both Ab concentration and sample volume. This leads to the notion of "ratiometric" immunoassay, involving measurement of the ratio of signals (e.g., fluorescent signals) emitted by two labeled Abs, the first (a "sensor" Ab) deposited as a microspot on a solid support, the second (a "developing" Ab) directed against either occupied or unoccupied binding sites of the sensor Ab. Our preliminary studies of this approach have relied on a dual-channel scanning-laser confocal microscope, permitting microspots of area 100 microns 2 or less to be analyzed, and implying that an array of 10(6) Ab-containing microspots, each directed against a different analyte, could, in principle, be accommodated on an area of 1 cm2. Although measurement of such analyte numbers is unlikely ever to be required, the ability to analyze biological fluids for a wide spectrum of analystes is likely to transform immunodiagnostics in the next decade.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1934470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  22 in total

Review 1.  Plasmonic technology: novel approach to ultrasensitive immunoassays.

Authors:  Joseph R Lakowicz; Joanna Malicka; Evgenia Matveeva; Ignacy Gryczynski; Zygmunt Gryczynski
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Multiplexed protein measurement: technologies and applications of protein and antibody arrays.

Authors:  Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Reverse phase protein microarrays advance to use in clinical trials.

Authors:  Claudius Mueller; Lance A Liotta; Virginia Espina
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Array feature size influences nucleic acid surface capture in DNA microarrays.

Authors:  David S Dandy; Peng Wu; David W Grainger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Time-resolved Förster-resonance-energy-transfer DNA assay on an active CMOS microarray.

Authors:  David Eric Schwartz; Ping Gong; Kenneth L Shepard
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 6.  Invited Review Article: Review of centrifugal microfluidic and bio-optical disks.

Authors:  David D Nolte
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.523

7.  Microarray-integrated optoelectrofluidic immunoassay system.

Authors:  Dongsik Han; Je-Kyun Park
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.800

8.  Realizing the promise of reverse phase protein arrays for clinical, translational, and basic research: a workshop report: the RPPA (Reverse Phase Protein Array) society.

Authors:  Rehan Akbani; Karl-Friedrich Becker; Neil Carragher; Ted Goldstein; Leanne de Koning; Ulrike Korf; Lance Liotta; Gordon B Mills; Satoshi S Nishizuka; Michael Pawlak; Emanuel F Petricoin; Harvey B Pollard; Bryan Serrels; Jingchun Zhu
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Real-time, multiplexed electrochemical DNA detection using an active complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor biosensor array with integrated sensor electronics.

Authors:  Peter M Levine; Ping Gong; Rastislav Levicky; Kenneth L Shepard
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 10.618

10.  High-resolution epifluorescence and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry chemical imaging comparisons of single DNA microarray spots.

Authors:  Archana N Rao; Nicolas Vandencasteele; Lara J Gamble; David W Grainger
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.