Literature DB >> 23150996

High-resolution epifluorescence and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry chemical imaging comparisons of single DNA microarray spots.

Archana N Rao1, Nicolas Vandencasteele, Lara J Gamble, David W Grainger.   

Abstract

DNA microarray assay performance is commonly compromised by spot-spot probe and signal variations as well as heterogeneity within printed microspots. Accurate metrics for captured DNA target signal rely upon uniform spot distribution of both probe and target DNA to yield reliable hybridized signal. While often presumed, this is neither easily achieved nor often proven experimentally. High-resolution imaging techniques were used to determine spot heterogeneity in identical DNA array microspots comprising varied ratios of unlabeled and dye-labeled DNA probes contact-printed onto commercial arraying surfaces. Epifluorescence imaging data for individual array microspots were correlated with time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) chemical state imaging of the same spots. Epifluorescence imaging intensity distinguished varying DNA density distributed both within a given spot and from spot to spot. TOF-SIMS chemical analysis confirmed these heterogeneous printed DNA distributions by tracking bound Cy3 dye, DNA base, and phosphate specific ion fragments often correlating to fluorescence patterns within identical spots. TOF-SIMS ion fragments originating from probe DNA and Cy3 dye are enriched in microspot centers, correlating with high fluorescence intensity regions. Both TOF-SIMS and epifluorescence support Marangoni flow effects on spot drying, with high-density DNA-Cy3 located in spot centers and nonhomogeneous DNA distribution within printed spots. Microspot image dimensional analysis results for DNA droplet spreading show differing DNA densities across printed spots. The study directly supports different DNA probe chemical and spatial microenvironments within spots that yield spot-spot signal variations known to affect DNA target hybridization efficiencies and kinetics. These variations critically affect probe-target duplex formation and DNA array signal generation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23150996      PMCID: PMC3525714          DOI: 10.1021/ac3019334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  60 in total

1.  Patterning of small particles by a surfactant-enhanced Marangoni-Bénard instability.

Authors:  Van X Nguyen; Kathleen J Stebe
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-04-03       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Microarray optimizations: increasing spot accuracy and automated identification of true microarray signals.

Authors:  Peter H Tran; Daniel A Peiffer; Yongchol Shin; Lauren M Meek; James P Brody; Ken W Y Cho
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Analysis of the microfluid flow in an evaporating sessile droplet.

Authors:  Hua Hu; Ronald G Larson
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 3.882

4.  Drying of DNA droplets.

Authors:  Xiaohua Fang; Bingquan Li; Eric Petersen; Young-Soo Seo; Vladimir A Samuilov; Yong Chen; Jonathan C Sokolov; Chwen-Yang Shew; Miriam H Rafailovich
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 5.  Manufacturing of microarrays.

Authors:  David W Petersen; Ernest S Kawasaki
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Evaporative self-assembly from complex DNA-colloid suspensions.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Siddharth Maheshwari; Hsueh-Chia Chang; Yingxi Zhu
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.882

7.  Rigid cyanine dye nucleic acid labels.

Authors:  Adrian Fegan; Pravin S Shirude; Shankar Balasubramanian
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Surfactant-induced Marangoni eddies alter the coffee-rings of evaporating colloidal drops.

Authors:  Tim Still; Peter J Yunker; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  A fiber-optic DNA biosensor microarray for the analysis of gene expression.

Authors:  J A Ferguson; T C Boles; C P Adams; D R Walt
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Development and application of a microarray meter tool to optimize microarray experiments.

Authors:  Richard J D Rouse; Katrine Field; Jennifer Lapira; Allen Lee; Ivan Wick; Colleen Eckhardt; C Ramana Bhasker; Laura Soverchia; Gary Hardiman
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2008-07-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  BIOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AT SURFACES RELEVANT TO MICROARRAY PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Archana N Rao; David W Grainger
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.843

2.  Three Dimensional Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Imaging (3D-SIMS) of Aedes aegypti ovarian follicles.

Authors:  Anthony Castellanos; Cesar E Ramirez; Veronika Michalkova; Marcela Nouzova; Fernando G Noriega; Fernández-Lima Francisco
Journal:  J Anal At Spectrom       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.023

3.  Real-time fluorescent image analysis of DNA spot hybridization kinetics to assess microarray spot heterogeneity.

Authors:  Archana N Rao; Christopher K Rodesch; David W Grainger
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  The Impact of Photobleaching on Microarray Analysis.

Authors:  Marcel von der Haar; John-Alexander Preuß; Kathrin von der Haar; Patrick Lindner; Thomas Scheper; Frank Stahl
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-11

5.  Optimization of Cyanine Dye Stability and Analysis of FRET Interaction on DNA Microarrays.

Authors:  Marcel von der Haar; Christopher Heuer; Martin Pähler; Kathrin von der Haar; Patrick Lindner; Thomas Scheper; Frank Stahl
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.