UNLABELLED: AIMS, DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Smoking care provision to in-patients is important in assisting smoking cessation and for management of nicotine withdrawal. Limited studies have reported the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the hospital-wide provision of such care. A quasi-experimental matched-pair trial, involving two intervention and two control hospitals in NSW, Australia, investigated whether a multi-strategic intervention increased hospital-wide smoking care provision. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Patient surveys (n = 274-347 per experimental condition), medical notes audits (n = 181-228) and health professional surveys (n = 229-302) were used to collect outcome data at baseline and follow-up. FINDINGS: Significantly greater increases in intervention hospitals compared to control hospitals were found for patient-reported offer of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (intervention 34% versus control 12%), provision of NRT (16% versus 4%) and provision of written resources (11% versus 2%), and for the recording in medical notes of smoking management discussion (13% versus 3%), offer of NRT (24% versus 3%) and provision of NRT (21% versus 5%). Intervention group health professionals reported significantly greater increases in the mean estimate of patients who: had their smoking management discussed (30% versus 17%); were offered or provided with NRT (30% versus 18%); were asked their intention to smoke post-discharge (22% versus 10%); and were provided with discharge NRT (21% versus 4%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multi-strategic intervention is effective in increasing hospital smoking care delivery, particularly the provision of NRT. Research is required to identify methods to increase further the delivery of this and other forms of smoking care.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: AIMS, DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Smoking care provision to in-patients is important in assisting smoking cessation and for management of nicotine withdrawal. Limited studies have reported the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the hospital-wide provision of such care. A quasi-experimental matched-pair trial, involving two intervention and two control hospitals in NSW, Australia, investigated whether a multi-strategic intervention increased hospital-wide smoking care provision. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Patient surveys (n = 274-347 per experimental condition), medical notes audits (n = 181-228) and health professional surveys (n = 229-302) were used to collect outcome data at baseline and follow-up. FINDINGS: Significantly greater increases in intervention hospitals compared to control hospitals were found for patient-reported offer of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (intervention 34% versus control 12%), provision of NRT (16% versus 4%) and provision of written resources (11% versus 2%), and for the recording in medical notes of smoking management discussion (13% versus 3%), offer of NRT (24% versus 3%) and provision of NRT (21% versus 5%). Intervention group health professionals reported significantly greater increases in the mean estimate of patients who: had their smoking management discussed (30% versus 17%); were offered or provided with NRT (30% versus 18%); were asked their intention to smoke post-discharge (22% versus 10%); and were provided with discharge NRT (21% versus 4%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multi-strategic intervention is effective in increasing hospital smoking care delivery, particularly the provision of NRT. Research is required to identify methods to increase further the delivery of this and other forms of smoking care.
Authors: David A Katz; Fengming Tang; Babalola Faseru; Phillip A Horwitz; Philip Jones; John Spertus Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: A Benjamin Srivastava; Alex T Ramsey; Leslie D McIntosh; Thomas C Bailey; Sherri L Fisher; Louis Fox; Mario Castro; Yinjiao Ma; Timothy B Baker; Li-Shiun Chen; Laura J Bierut Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: David A Katz; John Holman; Skyler Johnson; Stephen L Hillis; Sarah Ono; Kenda Stewart; Monica Paez; Steven Fu; Kathleen Grant; Lynne Buchanan; Allan Prochazka; Catherine Battaglia; Marita Titler; Mark W Vander Weg Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Emily Al Stockings; Jennifer A Bowman; John Wiggers; Amanda L Baker; Margarett Terry; Richard Clancy; Paula M Wye; Jenny Knight; Lyndell H Moore Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-07-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kathleen M McElwaine; Megan Freund; Elizabeth M Campbell; Jenny Knight; Carolyn Slattery; Emma L Doherty; Patrick McElduff; Luke Wolfenden; Jennifer A Bowman; Paula M Wye; Karen E Gillham; John H Wiggers Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-12-30 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kathleen M McElwaine; Megan Freund; Elizabeth M Campbell; Jenny Knight; Jennifer A Bowman; Emma L Doherty; Paula M Wye; Luke Wolfenden; Christophe Lecathelinais; Scott McLachlan; John H Wiggers Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Luke Wolfenden; Nicole Nathan; Christopher M Williams; Tessa Delaney; Kathryn L Reilly; Megan Freund; Karen Gillham; Rachel Sutherland; Andrew C Bell; Libby Campbell; Serene Yoong; Rebecca Wyse; Lisa M Janssen; Sarah Preece; Melanie Asmar; John Wiggers Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2014-10-11 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Kate M Bartlem; Jenny Bowman; Megan Freund; Paula M Wye; Daniel Barker; Kathleen M McElwaine; Luke Wolfenden; Elizabeth M Campbell; Patrick McElduff; Karen Gillham; John Wiggers Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 7.327