BACKGROUND: A minority of hospitalized smokers actually receives assistance in quitting during hospitalization or cessation counseling following discharge. This study aims to determine the impact of a guideline-based intervention on 1) nurses' delivery of the 5A's (Ask-Advise-Assess-Assist-Arrange follow-up) in hospitalized smokers, and 2) nurses' attitudes toward the intervention. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post guideline implementation trial involving 205 hospitalized smokers on the inpatient medicine units at one US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. The intervention included: 1) academic detailing of nurses on delivery of brief cessation counseling, 2) modification of the admission form to facilitate 5A's documentation, and 3) referral of motivated inpatients to receive proactive telephone counseling. Based on subject interviews, we calculated a nursing 5A's composite score for each patient (ranging from 0 to 9). We used linear regression with generalized estimating equations to compare the 5A's composite score (and logistic regression to compare individual A's) across periods. We compared 29 nurses' ratings of their self-efficacy and decisional balance ("pros" and "cons") with regard to cessation counseling before and after guideline implementation. Following implementation, we also interviewed a purposeful sample of nurses to assess their attitudes toward the intervention. RESULTS: Of 193 smokers who completed the pre-discharge interview, the mean nursing 5A's composite score was higher after guideline implementation (3.9 vs. 3.1, adjusted difference 1.0, 95 % CI 0.5-1.6). More patients were advised to quit (62 vs. 48 %, adjusted OR = 2.1, 95 % CI = 1.2-3.5) and were assisted in quitting (70 vs. 45 %, adjusted OR = 2.9, 95 % CI = 1.6-5.3) by a nurse during the post-implementation period. Nurses' attitudes toward cessation counseling improved following guideline implementation (35.3 vs. 32.7 on "pros" subscale, p = 0.01), without significant change on the "cons" subscale. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted intervention including academic detailing and adaptation of the nursing admission template is an effective strategy for improving nurses' delivery of brief cessation counseling in medical inpatients.
BACKGROUND: A minority of hospitalized smokers actually receives assistance in quitting during hospitalization or cessation counseling following discharge. This study aims to determine the impact of a guideline-based intervention on 1) nurses' delivery of the 5A's (Ask-Advise-Assess-Assist-Arrange follow-up) in hospitalized smokers, and 2) nurses' attitudes toward the intervention. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post guideline implementation trial involving 205 hospitalized smokers on the inpatient medicine units at one US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. The intervention included: 1) academic detailing of nurses on delivery of brief cessation counseling, 2) modification of the admission form to facilitate 5A's documentation, and 3) referral of motivated inpatients to receive proactive telephone counseling. Based on subject interviews, we calculated a nursing 5A's composite score for each patient (ranging from 0 to 9). We used linear regression with generalized estimating equations to compare the 5A's composite score (and logistic regression to compare individual A's) across periods. We compared 29 nurses' ratings of their self-efficacy and decisional balance ("pros" and "cons") with regard to cessation counseling before and after guideline implementation. Following implementation, we also interviewed a purposeful sample of nurses to assess their attitudes toward the intervention. RESULTS: Of 193 smokers who completed the pre-discharge interview, the mean nursing 5A's composite score was higher after guideline implementation (3.9 vs. 3.1, adjusted difference 1.0, 95 % CI 0.5-1.6). More patients were advised to quit (62 vs. 48 %, adjusted OR = 2.1, 95 % CI = 1.2-3.5) and were assisted in quitting (70 vs. 45 %, adjusted OR = 2.9, 95 % CI = 1.6-5.3) by a nurse during the post-implementation period. Nurses' attitudes toward cessation counseling improved following guideline implementation (35.3 vs. 32.7 on "pros" subscale, p = 0.01), without significant change on the "cons" subscale. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted intervention including academic detailing and adaptation of the nursing admission template is an effective strategy for improving nurses' delivery of brief cessation counseling in medical inpatients.
Authors: Jennifer Elston Lafata; Margaret J Gunter; John Hsu; Scott Kaatz; Richard Krajenta; Richard Platt; Lonni Schultz; Joseph V Selby; Steven R Simon; Jan Simpkins; Stephen B Soumerai; Connie Uratsu Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: J Lee Westmaas; Lorien Abroms; Jeuneviette Bontemps-Jones; Joseph E Bauer; Jeanine Bade Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: David Katz; Mark Vander Weg; Steve Fu; Allan Prochazka; Kathleen Grant; Lynne Buchanan; David Tinkelman; Heather Schacht Reisinger; John Brooks; Stephen L Hillis; Anne Joseph; Marita Titler Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: David A Katz; Kenda R Stewart; Monica Paez; Mark W Vander Weg; Kathleen M Grant; Christine Hamlin; Gary Gaeth Journal: Patient Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Mark W Vander Weg; John E Holman; Hafizur Rahman; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; Stephen L Hillis; Steven S Fu; Kathleen M Grant; Allan V Prochazka; Susan L Adams; Catherine T Battaglia; Lynne M Buchanan; David Tinkelman; David A Katz Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2017-04-04
Authors: Jeffrey L Fellows; Richard A Mularski; Michael C Leo; Charles J Bentz; Lisa A Waiwaiole; Melanie C Francisco; Kimberly Funkhouser; Catherine M Stoney Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: David A Katz; Kenda Stewart; Monica Paez; John Holman; Susan L Adams; Mark W Vander Weg; Catherine T Battaglia; Anne M Joseph; Marita G Titler; Sarah Ono Journal: Mil Med Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Sonia A Duffy; David L Ronis; Lee A Ewing; Andrea H Waltje; Stephanie V Hall; Patricia L Thomas; Christine M Olree; Kimberly A Maguire; Lisa Friedman; Sue Klotz; Neil Jordan; Gay L Landstrom Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Reto Auer; Baris Gencer; Rodrigo Tango; David Nanchen; Christian M Matter; Thomas Felix Lüscher; Stephan Windecker; François Mach; Jacques Cornuz; Jean-Paul Humair; Nicolas Rodondi Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Luigi Mario Castello; Chiara Airoldi; Marco Baldrighi; Sara Bortoluzzi; Liborio Martino Cammarata; Livia Franchetti Pardo; Clara Ada Gardino; Anil Babu Payedimarri; Matteo Giorchino; Giovanni Pistone; Viviana Stampini; Gian Carlo Avanzi; Fabrizio Faggiano Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.367