Literature DB >> 19344380

Experimental evidence that high levels of inbreeding depress sperm competitiveness.

S R K Zajitschek1, A K Lindholm, J P Evans, R C Brooks.   

Abstract

The effects of inbreeding on sperm quantity and quality are among the most dramatic examples of inbreeding depression. The extent to which inbreeding depression results in decreased fertilization success of a male's sperm, however, remains largely unknown. This task is made more difficult by the fact that other factors, such as cryptic female choice, male sperm allocation and mating order, can also drive patterns of paternity. Here, we use artificial insemination to eliminate these extraneous sources of variation and to measure the effects of inbreeding on the competitiveness of a male's sperm. We simultaneously inseminated female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) with equal amounts of sperm from an outbred (f = 0) male and either a highly (f = 0.59) or a moderately inbred (f = 0.25) male. Highly inbred males sired significantly fewer offspring than outbred males, but share of paternity did not differ between moderately inbred and outbred males. These findings therefore confirm that severe inbreeding can impair the competitiveness of sperm, but suggest that in the focal population inbreeding at order of a brother-sister mating does not reduce a male's sperm competitiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19344380     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01738.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  17 in total

1.  Inbreeding depresses sperm competitiveness, but not fertilization or mating success in male Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  Lukasz Michalczyk; Oliver Y Martin; Anna L Millard; Brent C Emerson; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cryptic female preference for genetically unrelated males is mediated by ovarian fluid in the guppy.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sex-specific effects of inbreeding on reproductive senescence.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Marcel Eens; Wendt Müller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fitness benefits of male dominance behaviours depend on the degree of individual inbreeding in a polyandrous lizard.

Authors:  Carmen Piza-Roca; David Schoeman; Celine Frere
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Quality evaluation of sperm from livebearing fishes: Standardized assessment of sperm bundles (spermatozeugmata) from Xenotoca eiseni (Goodeidae).

Authors:  Yue Liu; Leticia Torres; Terrence R Tiersch
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Demographic costs of inbreeding revealed by sex-specific genetic rescue effects.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Felix Zajitschek; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Sperm quality but not relatedness predicts sperm competition success in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Marion Mehlis; Anna K Rahn; Theo C M Bakker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Pattern of inbreeding depression, condition dependence, and additive genetic variance in Trinidadian guppy ejaculate traits.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Alessandro Devigili; Ryan Dosselli; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Dispersal and mating patterns determine the fate of naturally dispersed populations: evidence from Bombina orientalis.

Authors:  Liqun Yu; Shuai Zhao; Fanbing Meng; Yanshuang Shi; Chunzhu Xu
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-07

10.  Inbreeding reveals mode of past selection on male reproductive characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Outi Ala-Honkola; David J Hosken; Mollie K Manier; Stefan Lüpold; Elizabeth M Droge-Young; Kirstin S Berben; William F Collins; John M Belote; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.