| Literature DB >> 19343477 |
Yong Kyung Lee1, Dong Yeon Yuk, Tae Il Kim, Young Heui Kim, Kyoung Tae Kim, Ki Ho Kim, Beom Jun Lee, Sang-Yoon Nam, Jin Tae Hong.
Abstract
Magnolol, honokiol, and obovatol are well-known bioactive constituents of the bark of Magnolia officinalis and have been used as traditional Chinese medicines for the treatment of neurosis, anxiety, and stroke. We recently isolated novel active compound (named 4-O-methylhonokiol) from the ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis. The present study aimed to test two different doses of ethanol extracts of Magnolia officinalis (5 and 10 mg/kg/mouse, p.o., 1 week) and 4-O-methylhonokiol (0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg/mouse, p.o., 1 week) administered for 7 days on memory impairment induced by scopolamine (1 mg/kg body weight i.p.) in mice. Memory and learning were evaluated using the Morris water maze and the step-down avoidance test. Both the ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis and 4-O-methylhonokiol prevented memory impairment induced by scopolamine in a dose-dependent manner. The ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis and 4-O-methylhonokiol also dose-dependently attenuated the scopolamine-induced increase of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity in the cortex and hippocampus of mice, and inhibited AChE activity in vitro with IC(50) (12 nM). This study, therefore, suggests that the ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis and its major ingredient, 4-O-methylhonokiol, may be useful for the prevention of the development or progression of AD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19343477 PMCID: PMC2690856 DOI: 10.1007/s11418-009-0330-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nat Med ISSN: 1340-3443 Impact factor: 2.343
Fig. 1Chemical structure of 4-O-methylhonokiol (a) and experimental scheme (b)
Fig. 2Inhibitory effect of the ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis (a) and 4-O-methylhonokiol (b) on memory impairment induced by scopolamine in the passive avoidance test. Mice were administered the ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis at 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg and 4-O-methylhonokiol at 0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg for 1 week into drinking water, and then the training trial was given on the last day. After 24 h, the passive avoidance test was performed. Scopolamine (i.p., 1 mg/kg) was treated 30 min before the test trial as a positive control. Each value is mean ± standard error (SE) from ten animals. # P < 0.05 showed a significant difference compared with the controls. *P < 0.05 showed a significant difference compared with the scopolamine-treated controls
Fig. 3Inhibitory effect of the ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis (a) and 4-O-methylhonokiol (b) on memory impairment induced by scopolamine in the water maze test. Mice were administered the ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis at 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg and 4-O-methylhonokiol at 0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg for 1 week into drinking water. The mice were then given training trials six times (2 times/day), and the test was performed 24 h after the last training trial. Scopolamine (i.p., 1 mg/kg), as a positive control, was treated 10 min before the first test trial, as shown in the Fig. 1b. Each value is the mean ± SE from ten animals. # P < 0.05 showed a significant difference compared with the controls. *P < 0.05 showed a significant difference compared with the scopolamine-treated controls
Fig. 4Inhibitory effect of the ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis (a) and 4-O-methylhonokiol (b) on the AChE activity in the cortex and hippocampus of scopolamine-induced mice. Mice were treated with the ethanol extract of Magnolia officinalis (5 and 10 mg/kg) and 4-O-methylhonokiol (0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg) for 1 week into drinking water, and then the AChE activity was measured. Each value is the mean ± SE from ten animals. # P < 0.05 showed a significant difference compared with the controls. *P < 0.05 showed a significant difference compared with the scopolamine-treated controls
Inhibitory activities of acetylcholinesterase (AChE)
| Compound | Concentration | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 4- | 0.1 nM | 0.4 ± 0.1 |
| 1 nM | 10.43 ± 1.43 | |
| 10 nM | 47.4 ± 2.54 | |
| 100 nM | 68.11 ± 7.64 | |
| 1 μM | 78.11 ± 4.34 | |
| 10 μM | 84.15 ± 2.60 | |
| Tacrine | 1 nM | 1.14 ± 1.24 |
| 10 nM | 9.62 ± 2.32 | |
| 100 nM | 46.54 ± 3.86 | |
| 1 μM | 54.71 ± 7.74 | |
| 10 μM | 61.41 ± 2.94 | |
| 100 μM | 59.97 ± 5.31 |
Efficacy of inhibition was expressed as percent inhibition versus the control values (100%). Values represent mean ± SD (n = 5)