Literature DB >> 19343147

Genomic classifiers in colon cancer - clinical utility.

Daniel Sargent1.   

Abstract

Rapid technologic advances are allowing for the development of algorithms to predict both patient prognosis, and possibly, responsiveness to specific therapeutic interventions. Such classifiers may potentially be based on hundreds or thousands of possible factors, including data from genomic, proteomic, pathologic, or other factors. As such, in the absence of careful experimental design, there is considerable potential for an over-optimistic assessment of a classifier's true performance in the clinical setting. Here, I describe a multi-step methodology for the development and assessment of genomic classifiers in the setting of colon cancer. Critical issues include the stability and reproducibility of the assay methodology, appropriate choice of patient population, proper segregation of data into learning and validation cohorts, inclusion of known prognostic and predictive factors (eg, staging), and a critical examination of the most relevant performance characteristics. The need for prospective vs. retrospective confirmation is also discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19343147      PMCID: PMC2661547     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res        ISSN: 1934-7820


  8 in total

1.  Statistical issues in tumor marker studies.

Authors:  T F Pajak; G M Clark; D J Sargent; L M McShane; M E Hammond
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Issues and barriers to development of clinically useful tumor markers: a development pathway proposal.

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Barbara A Conley; Carmen Allegra; Laurence Collette
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Current issues in adjuvant treatment of stage II colon cancer.

Authors:  Thierry André; Daniel Sargent; Josep Tabernero; Michael O'Connell; Marc Buyse; Alberto Sobrero; Jean-Louis Misset; Corrado Boni; Aimery de Gramont
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Marc Peeters; Salvatore Siena; Yves Humblet; Alain Hendlisz; Bart Neyns; Jean-Luc Canon; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Joan Maurel; Gary Richardson; Michael Wolf; Rafael G Amado
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Christine M Ribic; Daniel J Sargent; Malcolm J Moore; Stephen N Thibodeau; Amy J French; Richard M Goldberg; Stanley R Hamilton; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Robert Gryfe; Lois E Shepherd; Dongsheng Tu; Mark Redston; Steven Gallinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial.

Authors:  Hervé Bonnefoi; Anil Potti; Mauro Delorenzi; Louis Mauriac; Mario Campone; Michèle Tubiana-Hulin; Thierry Petit; Philippe Rouanet; Jacek Jassem; Emmanuel Blot; Véronique Becette; Pierre Farmer; Sylvie André; Chaitanya R Acharya; Sayan Mukherjee; David Cameron; Jonas Bergh; Joseph R Nevins; Richard D Iggo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Levamisole and fluorouracil for adjuvant therapy of resected colon carcinoma.

Authors:  C G Moertel; T R Fleming; J S Macdonald; D G Haller; J A Laurie; P J Goodman; J S Ungerleider; W A Emerson; D C Tormey; J H Glick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-02-08       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT).

Authors:  Caroline Savage Bennette; Susan Brown Trinidad; Stephanie M Fullerton; Donald Patrick; Laura Amendola; Wylie Burke; Fuki M Hisama; Gail P Jarvik; Dean A Regier; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 8.822

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.