Literature DB >> 10888777

Statistical issues in tumor marker studies.

T F Pajak1, G M Clark, D J Sargent, L M McShane, M E Hammond.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Inferences from tumor marker studies are complicated by a variety of statistical concerns, which can make proper interpretation of results difficult. This article focuses on important issues that should be addressed when designing, conducting, and analyzing tumor marker studies.
OBJECTIVE: To highlight the importance of considering statistical significance, risk ratios, statistical power, reproducibility, multiple testing, confirmatory studies, and missing data in the design of marker studies used for prognosis.
RESULTS: Suggestions are provided for more effectively conducting marker studies. These include more careful attention to adequacy of the number of subjects for a marker study and improved documentation and standardization of assay methods. The importance of complete reporting of study results and description of the statistical analysis methods used is also emphasized.
CONCLUSION: Cooperation among clinicians, laboratory scientists, and statisticians will be required to conduct statistically sound tumor marker studies and to facilitate prioritizing markers for new and confirmatory studies in an environment of limited patient and specimen resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10888777     DOI: 10.5858/2000-124-1011-SIITMS

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  6 in total

1.  Genomic classifiers in colon cancer - clinical utility.

Authors:  Daniel Sargent
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07

2.  New Prognostic Markers: The Pathway from Research to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Caroline Savage; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Grand rounds Urol       Date:  2009-08

Review 3.  [Value of biomarkers in urology].

Authors:  P J Goebell; B Keck; S Wach; B Wullich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Systematic review of statistical methods used in molecular marker studies in cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Kwang Jang; Daniel Sargent; Hans Lilja; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Guidelines for development of diagnostic markers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Goebell; Susan L Groshen; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Molecular markers of response and toxicity to FOLFOX chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W Chua; D Goldstein; C K Lee; H Dhillon; M Michael; P Mitchell; S J Clarke; B Iacopetta
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.