Literature DB >> 19342314

Safety and effectiveness of Realize adjustable gastric band: 3-year prospective study in the United States.

Edward Phillips1, Jaime Ponce, Scott A Cunneen, Sunil Bhoyrul, Eddie Gomez, Sayeed Ikramuddin, Moises Jacobs, Mark Kipnes, Louis Martin, Robert T Marema, John Pilcher, Raul Rosenthal, Richard Rubenstein, Julio Teixeira, Thadeus Trus, Natan Zundel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and safety of bariatric surgery using laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands have been demonstrated in numerous published studies. We present the results of the first U.S. multicenter trial of the Realize adjustable gastric band, a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band previously available only outside the United States as the Swedish adjustable gastric band.
METHODS: A total of 405 morbidly obese patients were screened at 12 different centers from May to November 2003 to participate in a prospective, single-arm study of the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopically implanted Realize band. Changes in excess body weight, the parameters of diabetes and dyslipidemia, and the incidence of complications were assessed at 3 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: Of the 405 patients, 276 (78.3% women and 61.2% white) qualified for the study. The average age was 38.6 + or - 9.4 years (range 18-61), and the preoperative body mass index was 44.5 + or - 4.7 kg/m(2). The mean hospital stay was 1.2 + or - 1.3 days. At 3 years, the average excess weight loss was 41.1% + or - 25.1% or a decrease in the body mass index of 8.2 kg/m(2) (18.6%) (P < .001). In diabetic patients with a baseline elevated hemoglobin A(1)c level, the level decreased by 1% (P < .001). The total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides decreased by 9%, 16%, and 50%, respectively (P < .001), and the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 25% (P < .001) in patients with abnormal baseline values. One patient required conversion to an open surgical technique. No 30-day mortality occurred. The complication frequencies were generally low and included esophageal dysmotility in 0.4%, late balloon failure in 0.4%, band erosion in 0.4%, slippage in 3.3%, esophageal dilation in 3.3%, pouch dilation in 3.6%, catheter kinking in 1.1%, port displacement in 2.5%, and port disconnection in 4.3%. Reoperations were required in 15.2% of the patients and involved 2 band replacements, 9 band revisions, 5 port replacements, 22 port revisions, and 4 explants.
CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that the Realize adjustable gastric band is safe and effective in a diverse U.S. population of morbidly obese patients. Significant weight loss was achieved throughout the 3 years of follow-up, with corresponding improvements in the indicators of diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19342314     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  13 in total

1.  Mouse Models of Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Deng Ping Yin; Kelli L Boyd; Phillip E Williams; Naji N Abumrad; David H Wasserman
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2012-12-01

2.  The relationship between esophageal peristalsis and in vivo intraband pressure measurements in gastric banding patients.

Authors:  Martin Fried; Sudip K Ghosh; Mario Gutierrez; Karin Dolezalova; Tamara Widenhouse; Gaspar Gayoso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  The Band Must Not Be Abandoned.

Authors:  Wendy A Brown; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Medical devices for the treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Phong Ching Lee; John Dixon
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy Puzziferri; Thomas B Roshek; Helen G Mayo; Ryan Gallagher; Steven H Belle; Edward H Livingston
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Frequency of adjustments and weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Evan Valle; Minh B Luu; Khristi Autajay; Amanda B Francescatti; Louis F Fogg; Jonathan A Myers
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Impact of bariatric surgery in patients with HIV infection: a nationwide inpatient sample analysis, 2004-2014.

Authors:  Prabin Sharma; Thomas R McCarty; Julius N Ngu; Michael O'Donnell; Basile Njei
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 8.  Remission of type 2 diabetes: is bariatric surgery ready for prime time?

Authors:  Katherine Esposito; Maria Ida Maiorino; Michela Petrizzo; Giuseppe Bellastella; Dario Giugliano
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Safety of Bariatric Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis, 2004-2014.

Authors:  Thomas R McCarty; Prabin Sharma; Andrew Lange; Julius N Ngu; Ashley Davis; Basile Njei
Journal:  Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 0.607

10.  Location and number of sutures placed for hiatal hernia repair during laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: does it matter?

Authors:  Nabeel R Obeid; Spencer Deese-Laurent; Bradley F Schwack; Heekoung Youn; Marina S Kurian; Christine Ren-Fielding; George A Fielding
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.