Literature DB >> 19341841

Monitoring response to therapeutic interventions in patients with cancer.

Ken Herrmann1, Bernd Joachim Krause, Ralph A Bundschuh, Tobias Dechow, Markus Schwaiger.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (CT) with the glucose analog (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) are increasingly used to assess response to therapy in patients, and there is converging evidence that changes in glucose utilization during therapy can be used to predict clinical outcome. Today, integrated PET/CT systems have mainly replaced stand-alone PET devices, providing the opportunity to integrate morphologic information and functional information. However, the use of PET/CT systems also gives rise to methodological challenges for the quantitative analysis of PET scans for treatment monitoring. Recently published single-center studies demonstrate that FDG-PET and FDG-PET/CT have been successfully used for monitoring of tumor response to cytotoxic therapy in a variety of tumor entities. The potential early identification of nonresponding tumors provides an opportunity to alter treatment regimens according to the individual chemosensitivity of the tumor tissue. In this article, we review the methodological background to monitoring of cancer treatment with PET/CT, the diagnostic and prognostic performance of PET/CT for predicting tumor response with the glucose analog FDG in various tumor entities, and the clinical potential of new imaging probes. In addition, the future direction of research and clinical applications is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341841     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  11 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring cancer therapy with PET: probably effective, but more research is needed.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Probing carbohydrate metabolism using hyperpolarized 13 C-labeled molecules.

Authors:  Jaspal Singh; Eul Hyun Suh; Gaurav Sharma; Chalermchai Khemtong; A Dean Sherry; Zoltan Kovacs
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT.

Authors:  Ting Xia; Adam M Alessio; Bruno De Man; Ravindra Manjeshwar; Evren Asma; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Focal uptake of 68Ga-DOTATOC in the pancreas: pathological or physiological correlate in patients with neuroendocrine tumours?

Authors:  Akram Al-Ibraheem; Ralph Alexander Bundschuh; Johannes Notni; Andreas Buck; Anna Winter; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Markus Schwaiger; Klemens Scheidhauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  PET/MRI and PET/CT in follow-up of head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Marcelo A Queiroz; Martin Hüllner; Felix Kuhn; Gerhardt Huber; Christian Meerwein; Spyros Kollias; Gustav von Schulthess; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  How to study optimal timing of PET/CT for monitoring of cancer treatment.

Authors:  Werner Vach; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Barbara Malene Fischer; Oke Gerke; Wolfgang Weber
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07-20

7.  4D-CT-based motion correction of PET images using 3D iterative deconvolution.

Authors:  Lena Thomas; Thomas Schultz; Vesna Prokic; Matthias Guckenberger; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang; Melanie Hohberg; Markus Wild; Alexander Drzezga; Ralph A Bundschuh
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-04-26

8.  Current oncologic concepts and emerging techniques for imaging of head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Maliha Sadick; Stefan O Schoenberg; Karl Hoermann; Haneen Sadick
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-12-20

9.  Repeatability of the Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) in FDG PET.

Authors:  Henry Lindholm; Johan Staaf; Hans Jacobsson; Fredrik Brolin; Robert Hatherly; Alejandro Sânchez-Crespo
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2014-02-05

10.  CT versus FDG-PET/CT response evaluation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.

Authors:  Kristin Skougaard; Helle Hjorth Johannesen; Dorte Nielsen; Jakob Vasehus Schou; Benny Vittrup Jensen; Estrid V S Høgdall; Helle Westergren Hendel
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.