Literature DB >> 19341510

Effects of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in depressed primary-care patients: a randomized, controlled trial including a patients' choice arm.

Ulrich Hegerl1, Martin Hautzinger, Roland Mergl, Ralf Kohnen, Michael Schütze, Winfried Scheunemann, Antje-Kathrin Allgaier, James Coyne, Verena Henkel.   

Abstract

Mild depressive syndromes are highly prevalent among primary-care patients. Evidence-based treatment recommendations need to be derived directly from this diagnostically heterogeneous group. The primary aim was to assess the efficacy of sertraline and cognitive-behavioural group therapy for treatment of depressed primary-care patients, the secondary aim was to evaluate if receiving treatment according to free choice is associated with a better outcome than randomization to a particular treatment. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-centre, 10-wk trial with five arms: sertraline (flexible dosages up to 200 mg/d) (n = 83); placebo (n = 83); manual-guided cognitive-behavioural group therapy (one individual session and nine group sessions per 90 min) (n = 61); guided self-help group (control condition, n = 59); and treatment with sertraline or cognitive-behavioural group therapy according to patients' choice (n = 82). From 1099 consecutively screened adult patients, 368 formed the intent-to-treat population with milder forms of depression. Primary outcome was a global efficacy measure combining z-converted Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and clinician-rated Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology scores. Sertraline was superior to placebo (p = 0.03). Outcome for guided self-help groups was worse compared to cognitive-behavioural group therapy (p = 0.002) and compared to all other treatment arms including pill placebo (secondary analyses). Outcome in the patients' choice arm was similar to that in the sertraline and cognitive-behavioural group therapy. Overall, sertraline is efficacious in primary-care patients with milder forms of depression. The superiority of cognitive-behavioural group therapy over guided self-help groups might partly be explained by 'nocebo' effects of the latter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341510     DOI: 10.1017/S1461145709000224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 1461-1457            Impact factor:   5.176


  31 in total

1.  How close is evidence to truth in evidence-based treatment of mental disorders?

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Sensitivity to changes during antidepressant treatment: a comparison of unidimensional subscales of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression.

Authors:  Isabella Helmreich; Stefanie Wagner; Roland Mergl; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Martin Hautzinger; Verena Henkel; Ulrich Hegerl; André Tadić
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Primary care physicians' and psychiatrists' approaches to treating mild depression.

Authors:  R E Lawrence; K A Rasinski; J D Yoon; K G Meador; H G Koenig; F A Curlin
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.392

4.  Is psychotherapy effective? A re-analysis of treatments for depression.

Authors:  T Munder; C Flückiger; F Leichsenring; A A Abbass; M J Hilsenroth; P Luyten; S Rabung; C Steinert; B E Wampold
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 6.892

5.  [Should treatment of mild depression be exclusively psychotherapeutic? Against].

Authors:  U Hegerl
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  A network meta-analysis of the effects of psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and their combination in the treatment of adult depression.

Authors:  Pim Cuijpers; Hisashi Noma; Eirini Karyotaki; Christiaan H Vinkers; Andrea Cipriani; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 49.548

7.  Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Lindhiem; Charles B Bennett; Christopher J Trentacosta; Caitlin McLear
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-06-16

8.  General and comparative efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants in the acute treatment of depressive disorders: a report by the WPA section of pharmacopsychiatry.

Authors:  Thomas C Baghai; Pierre Blier; David S Baldwin; Michael Bauer; Guy M Goodwin; Kostas N Fountoulakis; Siegfried Kasper; Brian E Leonard; Ulrik F Malt; Dan Stein; Marcio Versiani; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  Depression beliefs, treatment preference, and outcomes in a randomized trial for major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Mary E Kelley; Tanja C Mletzko; Cristina M Velasquez; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  The symptom-specific efficacy of antidepressant medication vs. cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depression: results from an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lynn Boschloo; Ella Bekhuis; Erica S Weitz; Mirjam Reijnders; Robert J DeRubeis; Sona Dimidjian; David L Dunner; Boadie W Dunlop; Ulrich Hegerl; Steven D Hollon; Robin B Jarrett; Sidney H Kennedy; Jeanne Miranda; David C Mohr; Anne D Simons; Gordon Parker; Frank Petrak; Stephan Herpertz; Lena C Quilty; A John Rush; Zindel V Segal; Jeffrey R Vittengl; Robert A Schoevers; Pim Cuijpers
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.