Literature DB >> 19341509

Do atypical features affect outcome in depressed outpatients treated with citalopram?

Jonathan W Stewart1, Patrick J McGrath, Maurizio Fava, Stephen R Wisniewski, Sidney Zisook, Ian Cook, Andrew A Nierenberg, Madhukar H Trivedi, G K Balasubramani, Diane Warden, Ira Lesser, A John Rush.   

Abstract

Depressed patients with atypical features have an earlier onset of depression, a more chronic course of illness, several distinctive biological and familial features, and a different treatment response than those without atypical features. The efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have not been fully evaluated in depression with atypical features. This report evaluates data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study to determine whether depressed outpatients with and without atypical features respond differently to the SSRI citalopram. Treatment-seeking participants with non-psychotic major depressive disorder were recruited from primary- and psychiatric-care settings. The presence/absence of atypical features was approximated using baseline ratings on the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician-rated. Following baseline assessments, participants received citalopram up to 60 mg/d for up to 14 wk. Baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes, were compared between participants with and without atypical features. Of the 2876 evaluable STAR*D participants, 541 (19%) had atypical features. Participants with atypical features were significantly more likely to be female, younger, unemployed, have greater physical impairment, a younger age of depression onset, a longer index episode, greater depressive severity, and more concurrent anxiety diagnoses. Those with atypical features had significantly lower remission rates, although this difference was no longer present after adjustment for baseline differences. Depressed patients with atypical features are less likely to remit with citalopram than those without atypical features. This finding is probably due to differences in baseline characteristics other than atypical symptom features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341509     DOI: 10.1017/S1461145709000182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 1461-1457            Impact factor:   5.176


  24 in total

1.  Genome-wide approaches to antidepressant treatment: working towards understanding and predicting response.

Authors:  Karen Hodgson; Shaista Jeelani Mufti; Rudolf Uher; Peter McGuffin
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 2.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 3. Pharmacological Treatments.

Authors:  Sidney H Kennedy; Raymond W Lam; Roger S McIntyre; S Valérie Tourjman; Venkat Bhat; Pierre Blier; Mehrul Hasnain; Fabrice Jollant; Anthony J Levitt; Glenda M MacQueen; Shane J McInerney; Diane McIntosh; Roumen V Milev; Daniel J Müller; Sagar V Parikh; Norma L Pearson; Arun V Ravindran; Rudolf Uher
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  Depression symptom dimensions as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome: replicable evidence for interest-activity symptoms.

Authors:  R Uher; R H Perlis; N Henigsberg; A Zobel; M Rietschel; O Mors; J Hauser; M Z Dernovsek; D Souery; M Bajs; W Maier; K J Aitchison; A Farmer; P McGuffin
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 4.  Aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy for patients with major depressive disorder: overview and implications of clinical trial data.

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae; Andy Forbes; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Low emotion-oriented coping and informal help-seeking behaviour as major predictive factors for improvement in major depression at 5-year follow-up in the adult community.

Authors:  S Rodgers; C L Vandeleur; M-P F Strippoli; E Castelao; A Tesic; J Glaus; A M Lasserre; M Müller; W Rössler; V Ajdacic-Gross; M Preisig
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Behavioral activation for the treatment of atypical depression: a pilot open trial.

Authors:  Lauren M Weinstock; Mary K Munroe; Ivan W Miller
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2011-04-19

7.  Distinguishing Bipolar Depression from Unipolar Depression in Youth: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Rasim Somer Diler; Tina R Goldstein; Danella Hafeman; John Merranko; Fangzi Liao; Benjamin I Goldstein; Heather Hower; Mary Kay Gill; Jeffrey Hunt; Shirley Yen; Martin B Keller; David Axelson; Michael Strober; Satish Iyengar; Neal D Ryan; Boris Birmaher
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.576

8.  Atypical depressive symptoms as a predictor of treatment response to exercise in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Chad D Rethorst; Jian Tu; Thomas J Carmody; Tracy L Greer; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 9.  Clinical issues in use of atypical antipsychotics for depressed patients.

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  Relationship between obesity and depression: characteristics and treatment outcomes with antidepressant medication.

Authors:  Marisa S P Toups; Alyson K Myers; Stephen R Wisniewski; Benji Kurian; David W Morris; Augustus John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.