Literature DB >> 19341418

Innovations in the assessment of transplant center performance: implications for quality improvement.

D A Axelrod1, J D Kalbfleisch, R J Sun, M K Guidinger, P Biswas, G N Levine, C J Arrington, R M Merion.   

Abstract

Continuous quality improvement efforts have become a central focus of leading health care organizations. The transplant community has been a pioneer in periodic review of clinical outcomes to ensure the optimal use of limited donor organs. Through data collected from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and analyzed by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), transplantation professionals have intermittent access to specific, accurate and clinically relevant data that provides information to improve transplantation. Statistical process control techniques, including cumulative sum charts (CUSUM), are designed to provide continuous, real-time assessment of clinical outcomes. Through the use of currently collected data, CUSUMs can be constructed that provide risk-adjusted program-specific data to inform quality improvement programs. When retrospectively compared to currently available data reporting, the CUSUM method was found to detect clinically significant changes in center performance more rapidly, which has the potential to inform center leadership and enhance quality improvement efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341418     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02570.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  8 in total

1.  Real-time outcome monitoring following oesophagectomy using cumulative sum techniques.

Authors:  Geoffrey Roberts; Cheuk-Bong Tang; Mike Harvey; Sritharan Kadirkamanathan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-27

2.  Statistical approach to quality assessment in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Harald Schrem; Sophia Volz; Hans-Friedrich Koch; Jill Gwiasda; Priscila Kürsch; Alon Goldis; Daniel Pöhnert; Markus Winny; Jürgen Klempnauer; Alexander Kaltenborn
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Effect of centre volume and high donor risk index on liver allograft survival.

Authors:  Deepak K Ozhathil; Youfu Li; Jillian K Smith; Jennifer F Tseng; Reza F Saidi; Adel Bozorgzadeh; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Variation in organ quality between liver transplant centers.

Authors:  M L Volk; H A Reichert; A S F Lok; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  National assessment of early hospitalization after liver transplantation: Risk factors and association with patient survival.

Authors:  Pratima Sharma; Nathan P Goodrich; Douglas E Schaubel; Abigail R Smith; Robert M Merion
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  A weighted cumulative sum (WCUSUM) to monitor medical outcomes with dependent censoring.

Authors:  Rena Jie Sun; John D Kalbfleisch; Douglas E Schaubel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Volume and outcome relation in German liver transplant centers: what lessons can be learned?

Authors:  Annemarie Nijboer; Frank Ulrich; Wolf O Bechstein; Andreas A Schnitzbauer
Journal:  Transplant Res       Date:  2014-02-10

8.  Assessment and enrolment process for liver transplantation: nursing management through quality indicators.

Authors:  Fabíola Faustino de Machado Dias; Samira Scalso de Almeida; Marcio Dias de Almeida
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-04-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.