Literature DB >> 19340382

Technology and cost-effectiveness in knee arthroplasty: computer navigation and robotics.

Michael L Swank1, Martha Alkire, Michael Conditt, Jess H Lonner.   

Abstract

Our aim in this article is to describe the impact that navigation technology has had on the market share of a community hospital and, specifically, to determine whether a high-volume surgeon using these technologies actually costs the hospital more than other surgeons at the same hospital and more than national means. In addition, we develop a comparable cost-effectiveness model for robotic technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to demonstrate the potential cost-effectiveness at the same hospital.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19340382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  15 in total

1.  Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Thomas K John; Michael A Conditt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Robot-assisted vs. conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Fu; Yuning Wang; Xiang Li; Baozhan Yu; Ming Ni; Wei Chai; Libo Hao; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Future perspective of CAS in orthopaedics.

Authors:  S Zaffagnini; K Deep; N Confalonieri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Computer-assisted navigation in ACL reconstruction is attractive but not yet cost efficient.

Authors:  Jennifer Margier; Sandra David Tchouda; Jean-Jacques Banihachemi; Jean-Luc Bosson; Stéphane Plaweski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics.

Authors:  Karthik Karuppiah; Joydeep Sinha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Robotic versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Kyu-Jin Cho; Jong-Keun Seon; Won-Young Jang; Chun-Gon Park; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Graham Seow-Hng Goh; Merng Koon Wong; Pak Lin Chin; Darren Keng-Jin Tay; Seng-Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Moving beyond radiographic alignment: applying the Wald Principles in the adoption of robotic total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Graham S Goh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  How accurately can surgeons perform angle manipulation? Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of manual angle manipulation of orthopedic surgery: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Young Hwan Park; Woon Kim; Jung Woo Choi; Gi Won Choi; Hak Jun Kim
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.