Literature DB >> 19339908

Vestibular hypofunction in the initial postoperative period after surgical treatment of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Yuri Agrawal1, Americo A Migliaccio, Lloyd B Minor, John P Carey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1) Determine the prevalence of vestibular hypofunction in the immediate postoperative period after surgical treatment of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome. 2) Evaluate whether dehiscence length is associated with risk of postoperative vestibular hypofunction. 3) Compare the prevalences of immediate and late postoperative vestibular hypofunction. STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Subjects with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (n = 42) based on history, physiologic testing, and computed tomography findings, who underwent middle fossa craniotomy and superior canal dehiscence plugging. INTERVENTION: Dehiscence length was measured intraoperatively. Bedside horizontal head thrust testing (hHTT) was administered between postoperative days 1 to 7 to diagnose immediate postoperative vestibular hypofunction. Both hHTT and quantitative vestibulo-ocular reflex testing were administered 6 to 29 weeks postoperatively to detect late vestibular hypofunction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dehiscence length and hypofunction in response to hHTT.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of the subjects (95% confidence interval, 25-54) had hypofunction in response to hHTT within 1 week after surgery. Mean dehiscence lengths were 4.9 (range, 2.0-10.5 mm) and 3.4 mm (range, 1.0-5.5 mm) in subjects with and without postoperative hypofunction, respectively (p = 0.0018). Each 1-mm increase in dehiscence length increased the odds of immediate postoperative hypofunction 2.6-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.3-5.1). The prevalence of vestibular hypofunction was significantly higher in the early compared with the late postoperative period.
CONCLUSION: Immediate postoperative vestibular hypofunction is common, particularly with larger dehiscences. This hypofunction may typically resolve, given that the prevalence of vestibular hypofunction 6 weeks postoperatively is low. Possible mechanisms include intraoperative loss of perilymph, which may be more likely with larger dehiscences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19339908     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181a32d69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Transmastoid Plugging for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Clinical and Physiologic Predictors and Postoperative Outcomes of Near Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Baxter; Colin McCorkle; Carolina Trevino Guajardo; Maria Geraldine Zuniga; Alex M Carter; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Balance dysfunction and recovery after surgery for superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  Kristen L Janky; M Geraldine Zuniga; John P Carey; Michael Schubert
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-08

5.  Hearing outcomes after surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal by a middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Yuri Agrawal; Elena Nguyen; Charles C Della Santina; Charles J Limb; Howard W Francis; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Second-side surgery in superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  Yuri Agrawal; Lloyd B Minor; Michael C Schubert; Kristen L Janky; Marcela Davalos-Bichara; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Adaptation and Compensation of Vestibular Responses Following Superior Canal Dehiscence Surgery.

Authors:  Georgios Mantokoudis; Ali S Saber Tehrani; Aaron L Wong; Yuri Agrawal; Angela Wenzel; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Characteristics of Wax Occlusion in the Surgical Repair of Superior Canal Dehiscence in Human Temporal Bone Specimens.

Authors:  Yew Song Cheng; Elliott D Kozin; Aaron K Remenschneider; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Near-dehiscence: clinical findings in patients with thin bone over the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Angela Wenzel; Eva K Ritzl; Sergio Gutierrez-Hernandez; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.