Literature DB >> 19339741

Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses.

Dean R Melmoth1, Alison L Finlay, Michael J Morgan, Simon Grant.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of permanent versus brief reductions in binocular stereo vision on reaching and grasping (prehension) skills.
METHODS: The first experiment compared prehension proficiency in 20 normal and 20 adults with long-term stereo-deficiency (10 with coarse and 10 with undetectable disparity sensitivities) when using binocular vision or just the dominant or nondominant eye. The second experiment examined effects of temporarily mimicking similar stereoacuity losses in normal adults, by placing defocusing low- or high-plus lenses over one eye, compared with their control (neutral lens) binocular performance. Kinematic and error measures of prehension planning and execution were quantified from movements of the subjects' preferred hand recorded while they reached, precision-grasped, and lifted cylindrical objects (two sizes, four locations) on 40 to 48 trials under each viewing condition.
RESULTS: Performance was faster and more accurate with normal compared with reduced binocular vision and least accomplished under monocular conditions. Movement durations were extended (up to approximately 100 ms) whenever normal stereo vision was permanently (ANOVA P < 0.05) or briefly (ANOVA P < 0.001) reduced, with a doubling of error rates in executing the grasp (ANOVA P < 0.001). Binocular deficits in reaching occurred during its end phase (prolonged final approach, more velocity corrections, poorer coordination with object contact) and generally increased with the existing loss of disparity sensitivity. Binocular grasping was more uniformly impaired by stereoacuity loss and influenced by its duration. Adults with long-term stereo-deficiency showed increased variability in digit placement at initial object contact, and they adapted by prolonging (by approximately 25%) the time spent subsequently applying their grasp (ANOVA P < 0.001). Brief stereoreductions caused systematic shifts in initial digit placement and two to three times more postcontact adjustments in grip position (ANOVA P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: High-grade binocular stereo vision is essential for skilled precision grasping. Reduced disparity sensitivity results in inaccurate grasp-point selection and greater reliance on nonvisual (somesthetic) information from object contact to control grip stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19339741     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-3229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  35 in total

Review 1.  The role of stereopsis (three-dimensional vision) in dentistry: review of the current literature.

Authors:  M Syrimi; N Ali
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Stereopsis contributes to the predictive control of grip forces during prehension.

Authors:  Corey A Mroczkowski; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra A Hirji; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; David C Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Disparity-specific spatial interactions: evidence from EEG source imaging.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Suzanne P McKee; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Global motion perception is related to motor function in 4.5-year-old children born at risk of abnormal development.

Authors:  Arijit Chakraborty; Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Nabin Paudel; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Christopher J D McKinlay; Jane E Harding; Trecia A Wouldes; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Rethinking amblyopia 2020.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Age- and stereovision-dependent eye-hand coordination deficits in children with amblyopia and abnormal binocularity.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Catherine Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Miriam L Conway; John J Sloper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.