Literature DB >> 19338558

Should being aged over 70 years hinder penile prosthesis implantation?

Amr Al-Najar1, Carsten Maik Naumann, Sascha Kaufmann, Andrea Steinbach-Jensch, Moritz Franz Hamann, Klaus-Peter Jünemann, Christof van der Horst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) in their seventh decade of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 174 patients received, for the first time, a penile prosthesis between 1990 and 2007 in our department. Among these, 35 patients were aged > or =70 years at prosthesis implantation. Of these, 18 patients were still alive at the time of follow-up. Using a telephone survey, patients were asked to answer the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) as well as the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF). Another question in the survey was developed by the authors based on a comprehensive review of the literature, which assessed the usefulness of the device for the patient and the degree of their usage. This was formulated as follows: How many times per 2 weeks do you have a sexual intercourse?
RESULTS: In all, 15 of 18 patients were either very or somewhat satisfied (83%). At follow-up 11 out of 15 (73%) patients were using their prosthesis regularly. The mean IIEF and EDITS scores were 21.80 and 75.20, respectively.
CONCLUSION: A penile prosthesis remains a highly promising treatment in older patients with a similar satisfaction rate to those published for younger patients. Thus, the motivation of the patient and not the age of the patient should be the main determinant factor in this surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19338558     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08502.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  3 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Matt Solomon; Ling DeYoung; Gerald B Brock
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Andrew Kramer; William O Brant; Justin L Parker; Paul E Perito; Jeremy B Myers; Richard Bryson; Meagan Dunne
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Penile implants: a look into the future.

Authors:  Katherine M Rodriguez; Taylor P Kohn; Anthony B Davis; Tariq S Hakky
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.