Literature DB >> 19337931

Perceived breast cancer risk, social support, and distress among a community-based sample of women.

Sarah W Kinsinger1, Bonnie A McGregor, Deborah J Bowen.   

Abstract

Four dimensions of perceived social support (emotional/informational, tangible, affectionate, positive social interaction) were examined as moderators of the effect of perceived breast cancer risk on distress in a cross-sectional sample of 1,366 women recruited from the general population. Heightened perceived breast cancer risk predicted higher levels of depression, but only among women who reported low levels of perceived emotional/informational, tangible, affectionate, and positive social interaction support. Tangible and positive social interaction support mitigated the negative effect of heightened risk perception on anxiety. Perceived breast cancer risk was associated with greater cancer worry, regardless of the degree of social support perception. However, this association was weaker for women who perceived greater positive social interaction support. The results suggest that women's perceptions of social support availability can protect them against some of the adverse emotional consequences of heightened breast cancer risk perceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19337931     DOI: 10.1080/07347330902776002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol        ISSN: 0734-7332


  8 in total

1.  Dispositional cancer worry: convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of existing scales.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Jennifer K Bernat; LaShara A Davis; Robert Yale
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2010

2.  Maternal perspectives on the return of genetic results: context matters.

Authors:  Kimberley D Lakes; Elaine Vaughan; Amy Lemke; Marissa Jones; Timothy Wigal; Dean Baker; James M Swanson; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Prevalence of depression, trait anxiety, and social support during the diagnostic phases of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nor Zuraida Zainal; Chong Guan Ng; Angelvene Wong; Beatrice Andrew; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib; Sue-Yin Low
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-17

4.  Psychological impact of male breast disorders: literature review and survey results.

Authors:  Mike Kipling; Jane E M Ralph; Keith Callanan
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Correlates of misperception of breast cancer risk among Korean-American Women.

Authors:  Jiyun Kim; Bo Yun Huh; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2015-11-18

6.  Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max Bayne; Madi Fairey; Barbora Silarova; Simon J Griffin; Stephen J Sharp; William M P Klein; Stephen Sutton; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-08-11

7.  Mediating Effects of Risk Perception on Association between Social Support and Coping with COVID-19: An Online Survey.

Authors:  Dian-Jeng Li; Nai-Ying Ko; Yu-Ping Chang; Cheng-Fang Yen; Yi-Lung Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  A study of self-precaution against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of risk perception attitude theory and social support.

Authors:  Ruo-Nan Wang; Yue-Chi Zhang; Rang-Ke Wu; Bei Li; Chuang-Wei Li; Bo-Tao Yu; Yi-Li Zhang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.