Literature DB >> 19337867

Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobutrol for magnetic resonance perfusion in normal brain and intracranial tumors at 3 Tesla.

Frederik L Giesel1, Amit Mehndiratta, Frank Risse, Maria Rius, Christian M Zechmann, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk, Lars Gerigk, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Maria Politi, Marco Essig, Paul D Griffiths, Iain D Wilkinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In vitro studies have shown that the 3-Tesla (T) magnetic resonance (MR) characteristics of high- and standard-molar gadolinium-based contrast agents differ. Such differences may indicate that high-molar (1.0 M) agents offer advantages for perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) at 3T, as has been previously reported at 1.5 T.
PURPOSE: To investigate possible intraindividual differences of high- versus low-molar contrast agents on PWI at 3T in patients with intracranial space-occupying lesions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six patients with intraaxial and five patients with extraaxial tumors underwent two MR examinations at 3T, separated by at least 48 hours. On each occasion, an exogenous contrast-based, T2*-weighted, gradient-recalled echo-planar imaging (EPI) technique was used to determine the intracranial perfusion characteristics using one of two intravenous contrast agents: either 5 ml of 1.0 M gadobutrol or 10 ml of 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine. The primary PWI outcome measure was region-of-interest maximal signal change (C(max)).
RESULTS: The difference in C(max) for gray and white matter (Delta C(max)) was significantly higher for gadobutrol compared to gadopentetate dimeglumine (P<0.01). The ratio of C(max) between gray and white matter (rC(max) = C(maxGray)/C(maxWhite)) was also significantly higher (median 24.6%, range 13.7-36.5%) for gadobutrol (P<0.01). The ratio of C(max) between the whole tumor and whole normal side hemisphere was higher in five out of the six intraaxial tumor cases. A significantly higher ratio (Delta C(max)/C(max)) in the difference between C(max) of gray and white matter (from hemisphere without brain lesion) compared to C(max) for the hemisphere containing the neoplasm (hemisphere with brain lesion) was demonstrated for gadobutrol in intraaxial tumors (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Higher-concentration 1.0 M gadobutrol can offer advantages over standard 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine, particularly with respect to delineation between gray and white matter and for the demarcation of highly vascularized tumor tissue on brain PWI performed at 3T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19337867     DOI: 10.1080/02841850902787685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  11 in total

Review 1.  Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence.

Authors:  E Kanal; K Maravilla; H A Rowley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  MR imaging of neoplastic central nervous system lesions: review and recommendations for current practice.

Authors:  M Essig; N Anzalone; S E Combs; À Dörfler; S-K Lee; P Picozzi; A Rovira; M Weller; M Law
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Comparison of normal facial nerve enhancement at 3T MRI using gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Rupa Radhakrishnan; Shamima Ahmed; Joshua Cole Tilden; Humberto Morales
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2017-07-11

4.  Diagnostic yield of double-dose gadobutrol in the detection of brain metastasis: intraindividual comparison with double-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  E S Kim; J H Chang; H S Choi; J Kim; S-K Lee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review.

Authors:  Frederik L Giesel; Amit Mehndiratta; Marco Essig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  In vivo characterization of changing blood-tumor barrier permeability in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis: a complementary magnetic resonance imaging approach.

Authors:  Dean B Percy; Emeline J Ribot; Yuhua Chen; Catherine McFadden; Carmen Simedrea; Patricia S Steeg; Ann F Chambers; Paula J Foster
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions.

Authors:  Marco Essig; Mark S Shiroishi; Thanh Binh Nguyen; Marc Saake; James M Provenzale; David Enterline; Nicoletta Anzalone; Arnd Dörfler; Alex Rovira; Max Wintermark; Meng Law
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of DSC- and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Preoperative Grading of Astrocytomas.

Authors:  T B Nguyen; G O Cron; K Perdrizet; K Bezzina; C H Torres; S Chakraborty; J Woulfe; G H Jansen; J Sinclair; R E Thornhill; C Foottit; B Zanette; I G Cameron
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Advanced techniques using contrast media in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Ferré; Mark S Shiroishi; Meng Law
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 10.  Use of contrast agents in oncological imaging: magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Giovanni Morana; Christian Cugini; Giuliano Scatto; Riccardo Zanato; Michele Fusaro; Alberto Dorigo
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.