Literature DB >> 19337824

Time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model for saccadic reaction time: effect of auditory masker level on visual-auditory spatial interaction in elevation.

Hans Colonius1, Adele Diederich, Rike Steenken.   

Abstract

Saccadic reaction time (SRT) to a visual target tends to be shorter when auditory stimuli are presented in close temporal and spatial proximity, even when subjects are instructed to ignore the auditory non-target (focused attention paradigm). Previous studies using pairs of visual and auditory stimuli differing in both azimuth and vertical position suggest that the amount of SRT facilitation decreases not with the physical but with the perceivable distance between visual target and auditory non-target. Steenken et al. (Brain Res 1220:150-156, 2008) presented an additional white-noise masker background of three seconds duration. Increasing the masker level had a diametrical effect on SRTs in spatially coincident versus disparate stimulus configurations: saccadic responses to coincident visual-auditory stimuli are slowed down, whereas saccadic responses to disparate stimuli are speeded up. Here we show that the time-window-of-integration model accounts for this observation by variation of a perceivable-distance parameter in the second stage of the model whose value does not depend on stimulus onset asynchrony between target and non-target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19337824     DOI: 10.1007/s10548-009-0091-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  14 in total

1.  Testing sensory and multisensory function in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sarah H Baum; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Mark T Wallace; Ryan A Stevenson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The influence of vertically and horizontally aligned visual distractors on aurally guided saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  A F Ten Brink; T C W Nijboer; N Van der Stoep; S Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Prior knowledge of spatiotemporal configuration facilitates crossmodal saccadic response : A TWIN analysis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius; Farid I Kandil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The optimal time window of visual-auditory integration: a reaction time analysis.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11

6.  To bridge or not to bridge the multisensory time gap: bimanual coordination to sound and touch with temporal lags.

Authors:  C Roy; S Dalla Bella; J Lagarde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interactions between space and effectiveness in human multisensory performance.

Authors:  Aaron R Nidiffer; Ryan A Stevenson; Juliane Krueger Fister; Zachary P Barnett; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Effects of auditory stimuli in the horizontal plane on audiovisual integration: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Weiping Yang; Qi Li; Tatsuya Ochi; Jingjing Yang; Yulin Gao; Xiaoyu Tang; Satoshi Takahashi; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Shifts in Audiovisual Processing in Healthy Aging.

Authors:  Sarah H Baum; Ryan Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10

10.  The interaction of vision and audition in two-dimensional space.

Authors:  Martine Godfroy-Cooper; Patrick M B Sandor; Joel D Miller; Robert B Welch
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.