Literature DB >> 19337804

Scaphoid nonunion and distal fragment resection: analysis with three-dimensional rigid body spring model.

Hiroshi Matsuki1, Emiko Horii, Masataka Majima, Eiichi Genda, Shukuki Koh, Hitoshi Hirata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distal fragment resection is one of the salvage procedures for scaphoid nonunion with osteoarthritis. Despite being reported as a simple procedure with favorable midterm outcomes, further arthritic changes remain a concern in the long term. Scaphoid waist fracture is classified into volar or dorsal types according to the displacement pattern, but the indications for distal fragment resection have never been discussed for these fracture types.
METHOD: We reconstructed a normal wrist model from computed tomography images and performed theoretical analysis utilizing a three-dimensional rigid body spring model. Two types of scaphoid fracture nonunion followed by distal fragment resection were simulated.
RESULTS: With volar-type nonunion, the force transmission ratio of the radiolunate joint increased, and the pressure concentration was observed in the dorsal part of the scaphoid fossa and volar part of the lunate fossa of the radius; no deterioration was seen in the midcarpal joint. In the distal fragment resection simulation for volar-type nonunion, pressure concentrations of the radiocarpal joint resolved. With dorsal-type nonunion, force transmission ratio in the radiocarpal joint resembled that of the normal joint model. Pressure concentrations were observed in the dorsoulnar part of the scaphoid fossa and radial styloid. The pressure concentration in the dorsoulnar part of the scaphoid fossa disappeared in the resection model, whereas the concentration in the radial styloid remained. In the midcarpal joint, pressure was concentrated around the capitate head in the nonunion model and became aggravated in the resection model.
CONCLUSIONS: With volar-type scaphoid nonunion, distal fragment resection seems to represent a reasonable treatment option. With dorsal-type nonunion, however, pressure concentration around the capitate head was aggravated with the simulated distal fragment resection, indicating a potential risk of worsening any preexisting lunocapitate arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19337804     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-008-1310-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  5 in total

1.  Computationally efficient magnetic resonance imaging based surface contact modeling as a tool to evaluate joint injuries and outcomes of surgical interventions compared to finite element modeling.

Authors:  Joshua E Johnson; Phil Lee; Terence E McIff; E Bruce Toby; Kenneth J Fischer
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Evaluation of midcarpal capitate contact mechanics in normal, injured and post-operative wrists.

Authors:  Saman Modaresi; Madhan S Kallem; Phil Lee; Terence E McIff; E Bruce Toby; Kenneth J Fischer
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Midcarpal hemiarthroplasty for wrist arthritis: rationale and early results.

Authors:  Michael C Vance; Greg Packer; David Tan; J J Trey Crisco; Scott W Wolfe
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2012-08

4.  Three-dimensional stiffness of the carpal arch.

Authors:  Joseph N Gabra; Zong-Ming Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Intraosseous rotation of the scaphoid: assessment by using a 3D CT model--an anatomic study.

Authors:  Gernot Schmidle; Michael Rieger; Andrea Sabine Klauser; Michael Thauerer; Romed Hoermann; Markus Gabl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.