Literature DB >> 19336551

Performance of prediction models for BRCA mutation carriage in three racial/ethnic groups: findings from the Northern California Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Allison W Kurian1, Gail D Gong, Esther M John, Alexander Miron, Anna Felberg, Amanda I Phipps, Dee W West, Alice S Whittemore.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with early-onset breast and/or ovarian cancer frequently wish to know if they inherited a mutation in one of the cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2. Accurate carrier prediction models are needed to target costly testing. Two widely used models, BRCAPRO and BOADICEA, were developed using data from non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), but their accuracies have not been evaluated in other racial/ethnic populations.
METHODS: We evaluated the BRCAPRO and BOADICEA models in a population-based series of African American, Hispanic, and NHW breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. We assessed model calibration by evaluating observed versus predicted mutations and attribute diagrams, and model discrimination using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: Both models were well-calibrated within each racial/ethnic group, with some exceptions. BOADICEA overpredicted mutations in African Americans and older NHWs, and BRCAPRO underpredicted in Hispanics. In all racial/ethnic groups, the models overpredicted in cases whose personal and family histories indicated >80% probability of carriage. The two models showed similar discrimination in each racial/ethnic group, discriminating least well in Hispanics. For example, BRCAPRO's areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 83% (95% confidence interval, 63-93%) for NHWs, compared with 74% (59-85%) for African Americans and 58% (45-70%) for Hispanics.
CONCLUSIONS: The poor performance of the model for Hispanics may be due to model misspecification in this racial/ethnic group. However, it may also reflect racial/ethnic differences in the distributions of personal and family histories among breast cancer cases in the Northern California population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19336551      PMCID: PMC2706699          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  41 in total

1.  A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO.

Authors:  D G R Evans; D M Eccles; N Rahman; K Young; M Bulman; E Amir; A Shenton; A Howell; F Lalloo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis for simple and accurate detection of mutations: comparison with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and nucleotide sequencing.

Authors:  J Körkkö; S Annunen; T Pihlajamaa; D J Prockop; L Ala-Kokko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Multi-stage sampling in genetic epidemiology.

Authors:  A S Whittemore; J Halpern
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history.

Authors:  D A Berry; G Parmigiani; J Sanchez; J Schildkraut; E Winer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-02-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Likelihood analysis of multi-state models for disease incidence and mortality.

Authors:  J D Kalbfleisch; J F Lawless
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Regional differences in known risk factors and the higher incidence of breast cancer in San Francisco.

Authors:  A S Robbins; S Brescianini; J L Kelsey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-07-02       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis for rapid detection of single-base differences in double-stranded PCR products and DNA fragments: evidence for solvent-induced bends in DNA heteroduplexes.

Authors:  A Ganguly; M J Rock; D J Prockop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mutations and polymorphisms in the familial early-onset breast cancer (BRCA1) gene. Breast Cancer Information Core.

Authors:  F J Couch; B L Weber
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Jewish mutations in Spanish breast cancer patients.

Authors:  O Díez; A Osorio; M Robledo; A Barroso; M Domènech; J Cortés; J Albertos; J Sanz; J Brunet; J M SanRomán; M C Alonso; M Baiget; J Benítez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The Breast Cancer Family Registry: an infrastructure for cooperative multinational, interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Esther M John; John L Hopper; Jeanne C Beck; Julia A Knight; Susan L Neuhausen; Ruby T Senie; Argyrios Ziogas; Irene L Andrulis; Hoda Anton-Culver; Norman Boyd; Saundra S Buys; Mary B Daly; Frances P O'Malley; Regina M Santella; Melissa C Southey; Vickie L Venne; Deon J Venter; Dee W West; Alice S Whittemore; Daniela Seminara
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  22 in total

1.  Validation of three BRCA1/2 mutation-carrier probability models Myriad, BRCAPRO and BOADICEA in a population-based series of 183 German families.

Authors:  S M Schneegans; A Rosenberger; U Engel; M Sander; G Emons; M Shoukier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Population frequencies of pathogenic alleles of BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 173 Danish breast cancer pedigrees using the BOADICEA model.

Authors:  Thorkild Terkelsen; Lise-Lotte Christensen; Deirdre Cronin Fenton; Uffe Birk Jensen; Lone Sunde; Mads Thomassen; Anne-Bine Skytte
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Underestimation of risk of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer by BRCAPRO: a multi-institution study.

Authors:  Molly S Daniels; Sheri A Babb; Robin H King; Diana L Urbauer; Brittany A L Batte; Amanda C Brandt; Christopher I Amos; Adam H Buchanan; David G Mutch; Karen H Lu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Mutations in context: implications of BRCA testing in diverse populations.

Authors:  Gabriela E S Felix; Yonglan Zheng; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  The contribution of breast cancer pathology to statistical models to predict mutation risk in BRCA carriers.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Vargas; Leonard Da Silva; Sunil R Lakhani
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Prevalence and type of BRCA mutations in Hispanics undergoing genetic cancer risk assessment in the southwestern United States: a report from the Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weitzel; Jessica Clague; Arelis Martir-Negron; Raquel Ogaz; Josef Herzog; Charité Ricker; Chelsy Jungbluth; Cheryl Cina; Paul Duncan; Gary Unzeitig; J Salvador Saldivar; Mary Beattie; Nancy Feldman; Sharon Sand; Danielle Port; Deborah I Barragan; Esther M John; Susan L Neuhausen; Garrett P Larson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Multicenter cross-sectional screening of the BRCA gene for Chinese high hereditary risk breast cancer populations.

Authors:  Hongyi Wei; Minghao Wang; Jianghua Ou; Weihua Jiang; Fuguo Tian; Yuan Sheng; Hengyu Li; Hong Xu; Ruishan Zhang; Aihua Guan; Changqing Wang; Hongchuan Jiang; Yu Ren; Jianjun He; Jian Liu; Weiwei Huang; Ning Liao; Xiangjun Cai; Jia Ming; Rui Ling; Yan Xu; Chunyan Hu; Jianguo Zhang; Baoliang Guo; Lizhi Ouyang; Ping Shuai; Zhenzhen Liu; Ling Zhong; Ruilin Jing; Zhen Zeng; Meng Zhang; Ting Zhang; Zhaoling Xuan; Xuanni Tan; Junbin Liang; Qinwen Pan; Li Chen; Fan Zhang; Linjun Fan; Yi Zhang; Xinhua Yang; Jingbo Li; Chongjian Chen; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  The BRCAPRO 5.0 model is a useful tool in genetic counseling and clinical management of male breast cancer cases.

Authors:  Ines Zanna; Piera Rizzolo; Francesco Sera; Mario Falchetti; Paolo Aretini; Giuseppe Giannini; Giovanna Masala; Alberto Gulino; Domenico Palli; Laura Ottini
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Identification of the prevalent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in the female population of Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Julie Dutil; Jose L Colon-Colon; Jaime L Matta; Rebecca Sutphen; Miguel Echenique
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2012-05

10.  Novel BRCA1 deleterious mutation (c.1949_1950delTA) in a woman of Senegalese descent with triple-negative early-onset breast cancer.

Authors:  Orland Diez; Amadeu Pelegrí; Neus Gadea; Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez; Miriam Masas; Anna Tenés; Nina Bosch; Judith Balmaña; Begoña Graña
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.