Literature DB >> 19336476

Inverted duplications on acentric markers: mechanism of formation.

Andrea E Murmann1, Donald F Conrad, Heather Mashek, Chris A Curtis, Raluca I Nicolae, Carole Ober, Stuart Schwartz.   

Abstract

Acentric inverted duplication (inv dup) markers, the largest group of chromosomal abnormalities with neocentromere formation, are found in patients both with idiopathic mental retardation and with cancer. The mechanism of their formation has been investigated by analyzing the breakpoints and the genotypes of 12 inv dup marker cases (three trisomic, six tetrasomic, two polysomic and one X chromosome derived marker) using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization, quantitative SNP array and microsatellite analysis. Inv dup markers were found to form either symmetrically with one breakpoint or asymmetrically with two distinct breakpoints. Genotype analyses revealed that all inv dup markers formed from one single chromatid end. This observation is incompatible with the previously suggested model by which the acentric inv dup markers form through inter-chromosomal U-type exchange. On the basis of the identification of DNA sequence motifs with inverted homologies within all observed breakpoint regions, a new general mechanism is proposed for the acentric inv dup marker formation: following a double-strand break an acentric fragment forms, during either meiosis or mitosis. The open DNA end of the acentric fragment is stabilized by the formation of an intra-chromosomal loop promoted by the presence of sequences with inverted homologies. Likely coinciding with the neocentromere formation, this stabilized fragment is duplicated during an early mitotic event, insuring the marker's survival during cell division and its presence in all cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19336476      PMCID: PMC2685760          DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddp160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  44 in total

1.  Scoring pairwise genomic sequence alignments.

Authors:  F Chiaromonte; V B Yap; W Miller
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2002

2.  Segmental duplications: organization and impact within the current human genome project assembly.

Authors:  J A Bailey; A M Yavor; H F Massa; B J Trask; E E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Implications of human genome architecture for rearrangement-based disorders: the genomic basis of disease.

Authors:  Christine J Shaw; James R Lupski
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Complex low-copy repeats associated with a common polymorphic inversion at human chromosome 8p23.

Authors:  Hirobumi Sugawara; Naoki Harada; Tomoko Ida; Takafumi Ishida; David H Ledbetter; Ko-ichiro Yoshiura; Tohru Ohta; Tatsuya Kishino; Norio Niikawa; Naomichi Matsumoto
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data.

Authors:  Adam B Olshen; E S Venkatraman; Robert Lucito; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Olfactory receptor-gene clusters, genomic-inversion polymorphisms, and common chromosome rearrangements.

Authors:  S Giglio; K W Broman; N Matsumoto; V Calvari; G Gimelli; T Neumann; H Ohashi; L Voullaire; D Larizza; R Giorda; J L Weber; D H Ledbetter; O Zuffardi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-02-26       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Characterization of an analphoid, neocentromere-positive inv dup 8p marker chromosome using multiplex whole chromosome and sub-telomere FISH analyses.

Authors:  M Velinov; H Gu; M Genovese; C Duncan; P Warburton; S Sklower Brooks; E C Jenkins
Journal:  Ann Genet       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun

8.  Molecular cytogenetic characterization of two small chromosome 8 derived supernumerary mosaic markers.

Authors:  A Herry; F Morel; M-J Le Bris; V Bellec; H Lallaoui; P Parent; Marc De Braekeleer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Heterozygous submicroscopic inversions involving olfactory receptor-gene clusters mediate the recurrent t(4;8)(p16;p23) translocation.

Authors:  Sabrina Giglio; Vladimiro Calvari; Giuliana Gregato; Giorgio Gimelli; Silvia Camanini; Roberto Giorda; Angela Ragusa; Silvana Guerneri; Angelo Selicorni; Marcus Stumm; Holger Tonnies; Mario Ventura; Marcella Zollino; Giovanni Neri; John Barber; Dagmar Wieczorek; Mariano Rocchi; Orsetta Zuffardi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Neocentromeres in 15q24-26 map to duplicons which flanked an ancestral centromere in 15q25.

Authors:  Mario Ventura; Jonathan M Mudge; Valeria Palumbo; Sally Burn; Elisabeth Blennow; Mauro Pierluigi; Roberto Giorda; Orsetta Zuffardi; Nicoletta Archidiacono; Michael S Jackson; Mariano Rocchi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  17 in total

1.  Large inverted repeats within Xp11.2 are present at the breakpoints of isodicentric X chromosomes in Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Stuart A Scott; Ninette Cohen; Tracy Brandt; Peter E Warburton; Lisa Edelmann
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Centromere activity in dicentric small supernumerary marker chromosomes.

Authors:  Elisabeth Ewers; Kinya Yoda; Ahmed B Hamid; Anja Weise; Marina Manvelyan; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Ring chromosomes: from formation to clinical potential.

Authors:  Inna E Pristyazhnyuk; Aleksei G Menzorov
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Neocentromeres to the Rescue of Acentric Chromosome Fragments.

Authors:  Martin Poot
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2017-10-11

5.  Multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for rapid distinction between unique sequence positive and negative marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Petra Noomen; Malgorzata Srebniak; Guus Hamers; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Formation of novel CENP-A domains on tandem repetitive DNA and across chromosome breakpoints on human chromosome 8q21 neocentromeres.

Authors:  Dan Hasson; Alicia Alonso; Fanny Cheung; James H Tepperberg; Peter R Papenhausen; John J M Engelen; Peter E Warburton
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Human Structural Variation: Mechanisms of Chromosome Rearrangements.

Authors:  Brooke Weckselblatt; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  A de novo sSMC(22) Characterized by High-Resolution Arrays in a Girl with Cat-Eye Syndrome without Coloboma.

Authors:  C Córdova-Fletes; M G Domínguez; A Vázquez-Cárdenas; L E Figuera; V A Neira; A Rojas-Martínez; R Ortiz-López
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2012-08-01

9.  Neocentric X-chromosome in a girl with Turner-like syndrome.

Authors:  Morteza Hemmat; Boris T Wang; Peter E Warburton; Xiaojing Yang; Fatih Z Boyar; Mohammed El Naggar; Arturo Anguiano
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Origin-dependent inverted-repeat amplification: a replication-based model for generating palindromic amplicons.

Authors:  Bonita J Brewer; Celia Payen; M K Raghuraman; Maitreya J Dunham
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.