Literature DB >> 19335457

Automated tracking of migrating cells in phase-contrast video microscopy sequences using image registration.

A J Hand1, T Sun, D C Barber, D R Hose, S MacNeil.   

Abstract

Analysis of in vitro cell motility is a useful tool for assessing cellular response to a range of factors. However, the majority of cell-tracking systems available are designed primarily for use with fluorescently labelled images. In this paper, five commonly used tracking systems are examined for their performance compared with the use of a novel in-house cell-tracking system based on the principles of image registration and optical flow. Image registration is a tool commonly used in medical imaging to correct for the effects of patient motion during imaging procedures and works well on low-contrast images, such as those found in bright-field and phase-contrast microscopy. The five cell-tracking systems examined were Retrac, a manual tracking system used as the gold standard; CellTrack, a recently released freely downloadable software system that uses a combination of tracking methods; ImageJ, which is a freely available piece of software with a plug-in for automated tracking (MTrack2) and Imaris and Volocity, both commercially available automated tracking systems. All systems were used to track migration of human epithelial cells over ten frames of a phase-contrast time-lapse microscopy sequence. This showed that the in-house image-registration system was the most effective of those tested when tracking non-dividing epithelial cells in low-contrast images, with a successful tracking rate of 95%. The performance of the tracking systems was also evaluated by tracking fluorescently labelled epithelial cells imaged with both phase-contrast and confocal microscopy techniques. The results showed that using fluorescence microscopy instead of phase contrast does improve the tracking efficiency for each of the tested systems. For the in-house software, this improvement was relatively small (<5% difference in tracking success rate), whereas much greater improvements in performance were seen when using fluorescence microscopy with Volocity and ImageJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19335457     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03144.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microsc        ISSN: 0022-2720            Impact factor:   1.758


  21 in total

1.  Micro-object motion tracking based on the probability hypothesis density particle tracker.

Authors:  Chunmei Shi; Lingling Zhao; Junjie Wang; Chiping Zhang; Xiaohong Su; Peijun Ma
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Automated velocity mapping of migrating cell populations (AVeMap).

Authors:  Maxime Deforet; Maria Carla Parrini; Laurence Petitjean; Marco Biondini; Axel Buguin; Jacques Camonis; Pascal Silberzan
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  CELL TRACKING USING PARTICLE FILTERS WITH IMPLICIT CONVEX SHAPE MODEL IN 4D CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY IMAGES.

Authors:  Nisha Ramesh; Tolga Tasdizen
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Image Proc       Date:  2014-10

4.  Electrotaxis of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in a multiple-electric-field chip with uniform flow field.

Authors:  Hsieh-Fu Tsai; Shih-Wei Peng; Chun-Ying Wu; Hui-Fang Chang; Ji-Yen Cheng
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Automated Tracking of Cell Migration with Rapid Data Analysis.

Authors:  Brian J DuChez
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cell Biol       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 6.  Systems microscopy approaches to understand cancer cell migration and metastasis.

Authors:  Sylvia E Le Dévédec; Kuan Yan; Hans de Bont; Veerander Ghotra; Hoa Truong; Erik H Danen; Fons Verbeek; Bob van de Water
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Wide field-of-view on-chip Talbot fluorescence microscopy for longitudinal cell culture monitoring from within the incubator.

Authors:  Chao Han; Shuo Pang; Danielle V Bower; Patrick Yiu; Changhuei Yang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Accumulative difference image protocol for particle tracking in fluorescence microscopy tested in mouse lymphonodes.

Authors:  Carlo E Villa; Michele Caccia; Laura Sironi; Laura D'Alfonso; Maddalena Collini; Ilaria Rivolta; Giuseppe Miserocchi; Tatiana Gorletta; Ivan Zanoni; Francesca Granucci; Giuseppe Chirico
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A novel validation algorithm allows for automated cell tracking and the extraction of biologically meaningful parameters.

Authors:  Daniel H Rapoport; Tim Becker; Amir Madany Mamlouk; Simone Schicktanz; Charli Kruse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Imaging, quantification and visualization of spatio-temporal patterning in mESC colonies under different culture conditions.

Authors:  N Scherf; M Herberg; K Thierbach; T Zerjatke; T Kalkan; P Humphreys; A Smith; I Glauche; I Roeder
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.