Literature DB >> 19335409

Unsuccessful alloplastic esophageal replacement with porcine small intestinal submucosa.

Thorsten Doede1, Michail Bondartschuk, Carsten Joerck, Eberhard Schulze, Matthias Goernig.   

Abstract

In general, there is no perfect method for esophageal replacement under consideration of the numerous associated risks and complications. The aim of this study was to examine a new material--small intestinal submucosa (SIS)--in alloplastic esophageal replacement. We implanted tubular SIS prosthesis about 4 cm in length in the cervical esophagus of 14 piglets (weight 9-13 kg). For the first 10 days, the animals were fed parenterally, supplemented by free given water, followed by an oral feeding phase. Four weeks after surgery, the animals were sacrificed. Only 1 of the 14 animals survived the study period of 4 weeks. The other piglets had to be sacrificed prematurely because of severe esophageal stenosis. On postmortem exploration, the prosthesis could not be found either macroscopically or histologically. Sutures between the prosthesis and the cervical muscles did not improve the results. Until now, the use of alloplastic materials in esophageal replacement has failed irrespective of the kind of material. As well as in our experiments, severe stenosis had been reported in several animal studies. The reasons for this unacceptable high rate of stenosis after alloplastic esophageal replacement seem to be multifactorial. Possible solutions could be transanastomotic splints, less inert materials, the decrease of anastomotic tension by stay sutures, the use of adult stem cells, and tissue engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19335409     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00727.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  23 in total

Review 1.  Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research perspectives for pediatric surgery.

Authors:  Amulya K Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Fluorescence-activated cell sorting of PCK-26 antigen-positive cells enables selection of ovine esophageal epithelial cells with improved viability on scaffolds for esophagus tissue engineering.

Authors:  Kristina Kofler; Herwig Ainoedhofer; Michael E Höllwarth; Amulya K Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Bioengineering and regeneration of gastrointestinal tissue: where are we now and what comes next?

Authors:  Elie Zakhem; Shreya Raghavan; Riley A Suhar; Khalil N Bitar
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 4.  Esophageal tissue engineering: a new approach for esophageal replacement.

Authors:  Giorgia Totonelli; Panagiotis Maghsoudlou; Jonathan M Fishman; Giuseppe Orlando; Tahera Ansari; Paul Sibbons; Martin A Birchall; Agostino Pierro; Simon Eaton; Paolo De Coppi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Bioengineering the gut: future prospects of regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Khalil N Bitar; Elie Zakhem
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Acellular bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds support functional tissue regeneration in a rat model of onlay esophagoplasty.

Authors:  Khalid Algarrahi; Debra Franck; Chiara E Ghezzi; Vivian Cristofaro; Xuehui Yang; Maryrose P Sullivan; Yeun Goo Chung; Saif Affas; Russell Jennings; David L Kaplan; Carlos R Estrada; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Bilayer silk fibroin grafts support functional oesophageal repair in a rodent model of caustic injury.

Authors:  Khalid Algarrahi; Debra Franck; Alyssa Savarino; Vivian Cristofaro; Xuehui Yang; Saif Affas; Frank-Mattias Schäfer; Maryrose P Sullivan; Carlos R Estrada; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 8.  Regenerative medicine for the esophagus.

Authors:  Kengo Kanetaka; Shinichiro Kobayashi; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  In vitro development and characterization of a tissue-engineered conduit resembling esophageal wall using human and pig skeletal myoblast, oral epithelial cells, and biologic scaffolds.

Authors:  Tigran Poghosyan; Sebastien Gaujoux; Valerie Vanneaux; Patrick Bruneval; Thomas Domet; Severine Lecourt; Mohamed Jarraya; Rony Sfeir; Jerome Larghero; Pierre Cattan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Detergent enzymatic treatment for the development of a natural acellular matrix for oesophageal regeneration.

Authors:  Giorgia Totonelli; Panagiotis Maghsoudlou; Fanourious Georgiades; Massimo Garriboli; Kiron Koshy; Mark Turmaine; Michael Ashworth; Neil J Sebire; Agostino Pierro; Simon Eaton; Paolo De Coppi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.