Literature DB >> 28371514

Bilayer silk fibroin grafts support functional oesophageal repair in a rodent model of caustic injury.

Khalid Algarrahi1,2, Debra Franck1, Alyssa Savarino1, Vivian Cristofaro2,3,4, Xuehui Yang1, Saif Affas1,2, Frank-Mattias Schäfer1, Maryrose P Sullivan2,3,4, Carlos R Estrada1,2, Joshua R Mauney1,2.   

Abstract

Surgical repair of caustic oesophageal injuries with autologous gastrointestinal segments is often associated with dysmotility, dysphagia and donor site morbidity, and therefore alternative graft options are needed. Bilayer silk fibroin (BLSF) scaffolds were assessed for their ability to support functional restoration of damaged oesophageal tissues in a rat model of onlay oesophagoplasty. Transient exposure of isolated oesophageal segments with 40% NaOH led to corrosive oesophagitis and a 91% reduction in the luminal cross-sectional area of damaged sites. Oesophageal repair with BLSF matrices was performed in injured rats (n = 27) as well as a nondiseased cohort (n = 12) for up to 2 months after implantation. Both implant groups exhibited >80% survival rates, displayed similar degrees of weight gain, and were capable of solid food consumption following a 3-day liquid diet. End-point μ-computed tomography of repaired sites demonstrated a 4.5-fold increase in luminal cross-sectional area over baseline injury levels. Reconstructed oesophageal conduits from damaged and nondiseased animals produced comparable contractile responses to KCl and electric field stimulation while isoproterenol generated similar tissue relaxation responses. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluations of neotissues from both implant groups showed formation of a stratified, squamous epithelium with robust cytokeratin expression as well as skeletal and smooth muscle layers positive for contractile protein expression. In addition, synaptophysin positive neuronal junctions and vessels lined with CD31 positive endothelial cells were also observed at graft sites in each setting. These results provide preclinical validation for the use of BLSF scaffolds in reconstructive strategies for oesophageal repair following caustic injury.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28371514      PMCID: PMC5623158          DOI: 10.1002/term.2434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  20 in total

1.  A bioabsorbable polymer patch for the treatment of esophageal defect in a porcine model.

Authors:  Masayasu Aikawa; Mitsuo Miyazawa; Kojun Okamoto; Katsuya Okada; Naoe Akimoto; Hiroshi Sato; Isamu Koyama; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Yoshito Ikada
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Histologic changes after urethroplasty using small intestinal submucosa unseeded with cells in rabbits with injured urethra.

Authors:  Gustavo Martín Villoldo; Mónica Loresi; Carlos Giudice; Oscar Damia; Juan Manuel Moldes; Francisco DeBadiola; Mariana Barbich; Pablo Argibay
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Caustic oesophagitis in children: prevalence, the corrosive agents involved, and management from primary care through to surgery.

Authors:  Ibrahim Uygun
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 4.  Endoscopic management of esophageal stenosis in children: New and traditional treatments.

Authors:  Luigi Dall'Oglio; Tamara Caldaro; Francesca Foschia; Simona Faraci; Giovanni Federici di Abriola; Francesca Rea; Erminia Romeo; Filippo Torroni; Giulia Angelino; Paola De Angelis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-25

5.  Resorbable bioscaffold for esophageal repair in a dog model.

Authors:  S Badylak; S Meurling; M Chen; A Spievack; A Simmons-Byrd
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Esophageal preservation in five male patients after endoscopic inner-layer circumferential resection in the setting of superficial cancer: a regenerative medicine approach with a biologic scaffold.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Toshitaka Hoppo; Alejandro Nieponice; Thomas W Gilbert; Jon M Davison; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Esophageal replacement in rat using porcine intestinal submucosa as a patch or a tube-shaped graft.

Authors:  M F Lopes; A Cabrita; J Ilharco; P Pessa; J Paiva-Carvalho; A Pires; J Patrício
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  In-vivo oesophageal regeneration in a human being by use of a non-biological scaffold and extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Kulwinder S Dua; Walter J Hogan; Abdul A Aadam; Mario Gasparri
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Esophageal replacements in children.

Authors:  Olivier Reinberg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Review of esophageal injuries and stenosis: Lessons learn and current concepts of management.

Authors:  Raghu Sampalli Ramareddy; Anand Alladi
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
View more
  2 in total

1.  Repair of injured urethras with silk fibroin scaffolds in a rabbit model of onlay urethroplasty.

Authors:  Khalid Algarrahi; Saif Affas; Bryan S Sack; Xuehui Yang; Kyle Costa; Catherine Seager; Carlos R Estrada; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Evaluation of Bilayer Silk Fibroin Grafts for Tubular Esophagoplasty in a Porcine Defect Model.

Authors:  Gokhan Gundogdu; Duncan Morhardt; Vivian Cristofaro; Khalid Algarrahi; Xuehui Yang; Kyle Costa; Cinthia Galvez Alegria; Maryrose P Sullivan; Joshua R Mauney
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.845

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.