Literature DB >> 19335225

Incidence of microperforation for surgical gloves depends on duration of wear.

Lars Ivo Partecke1, Anna-Maria Goerdt, Inga Langner, Bernd Jaeger, Ojan Assadian, Claus-Dieter Heidecke, Axel Kramer, Nils-Olaf Huebner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of sterile gloves is part of general aseptic procedure, which aims to prevent surgical team members from transmitting infectious agents to patients during procedures performed in an operating room. In addition, surgical gloves also protect team members against patient-transmitted infectious agents. Adequate protection, however, requires that the glove material remain intact. The risk of perforations in surgical gloves is thought to correlate with the duration of wear, yet very few prospective studies have addressed this issue.
METHODS: We prospectively collected 898 consecutive pairs of used surgical gloves over a 9-month period in a single institution. After surgical team members wore the gloves during surgical procedures, the gloves were examined for microperforations using the watertight test described in European Norm 455, part 1. The gloves were analyzed as a pair; if 1 glove had a perforation, the pair was considered to be perforated. In addition, we evaluated the use of a hand cream that contained a suspension of cornstarch and ethanol to determine its potential influence on the rate of microperforation.
RESULTS: Wearing gloves for 90 minutes or less resulted in microperforations in 46 (15.4%) of 299 pairs of gloves, whereas wearing gloves for 91-150 minutes resulted in perforation of 54 (18.1%) of 299 pairs, and 71 of (23.7%) of 300 pairs were perforated when the duration of wear was longer than 150 minutes (P = .05). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the rates of microperforation for surgeons (56 [23.0%] of 244 pairs of gloves perforated), first assistants (43 [19.0%] of 226 pairs perforated), and surgical nurses (53 [20.5%] of 259 pairs perforated). Of 171 microperforations, 114 (66.7%) were found on the left hand glove (ie, the glove on subjects' nondominant hand), predominantly on the left index finger (55 [32.3%]). The use of the hand cream had no influence on the rate of microperforation.
CONCLUSION: Because of the increase in the rate of microperforation over time, it is recommended that surgeons, first assistants, and surgical nurses directly assisting in the operating field change gloves after 90 minutes of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19335225     DOI: 10.1086/597062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  24 in total

1.  Suppression of surgeons' bacterial hand flora during surgical procedures with a new antimicrobial surgical glove.

Authors:  Ojan Assadian; Axel Kramer; Kenneth Ouriel; Miranda Suchomel; Mary-Louise McLaws; Martin Rottman; David Leaper; Afshin Assadian
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.150

Review 2.  [Definition and management of wound infections].

Authors:  S Maier; P Körner; S Diedrich; A Kramer; C-D Heidecke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Strategies to prevent surgical site infections].

Authors:  I F Chaberny; K Graf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Perioperative immunonutrition in normo-nourished patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Authors:  Pedro Moya; Elena Miranda; Leticia Soriano-Irigaray; Antonio Arroyo; Maria-Del-Mar Aguilar; Marta Bellón; Jose-Luis Muñoz; Fernando Candela; Rafael Calpena
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A 1-minute hand wash does not impair the efficacy of a propanol-based hand rub in two consecutive surgical hand disinfection procedures.

Authors:  G Kampf; C Ostermeyer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  [Aortofemoral vascular graft infections and their prevention].

Authors:  F Taher; O Assadian; K Hirsch; J Falkensammer; C Senekowitsch; A Assadian
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  High Risk of Surgical Glove Perforation From Surgical Rotatory Instruments.

Authors:  Ashton H Goldman; Emanuel Haug; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Gregory J Golladay
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Bacterial migration through punctured surgical gloves under real surgical conditions.

Authors:  Nils-Olaf Hübner; Anna-Maria Goerdt; Natalie Stanislawski; Ojan Assadian; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Axel Kramer; Lars Ivo Partecke
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use.

Authors:  Johannes Leitgeb; Rupert Schuster; Bit New Yee; Pui Fong Chee; Julian-Camill Harnoss; Peter Starzengruber; Michael Schäffer; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  The durability of examination gloves used on intensive care units.

Authors:  Nils-Olaf Hübner; Anna-Maria Goerdt; Axel Mannerow; Ute Pohrt; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Axel Kramer; Lars Ivo Partecke
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.