Literature DB >> 19333148

Molecular similarity methods for predicting cross-reactivity with therapeutic drug monitoring immunoassays.

Matthew D Krasowski1, Mohamed G Siam, Manisha Iyer, Sean Ekins.   

Abstract

Immunoassays are used for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), yet may suffer from cross-reacting compounds able to bind the assay antibodies in a manner similar to the target molecule. To our knowledge, there has been no investigation using computational tools to predict cross-reactivity with TDM immunoassays. The authors used molecular similarity methods to enable calculation of structural similarity for a wide range of compounds (prescription and over-the-counter medications, illicit drugs, and clinically significant metabolites) to the target molecules of TDM immunoassays. Utilizing different molecular descriptors (MDL public keys, functional class fingerprints, and pharmacophore fingerprints) and the Tanimoto similarity coefficient, the authors compared cross-reactivity data in the package inserts of immunoassays marketed for in vitro diagnostic use. Using MDL public keys and the Tanimoto similarity coefficient showed a strong and statistically significant separation between cross-reactive and non-cross-reactive compounds. Thus, 2-dimensional shape similarity of cross-reacting molecules and the target molecules of TDM immunoassays provides a fast chemoinformatics methods for a priori prediction of potential of cross-reactivity that might be otherwise undetected. These methods could be used to reliably focus cross-reactivity testing on compounds with high similarity to the target molecule and limit testing of compounds with low similarity and ultimately with a very low probability of cross-reacting with the assay in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19333148      PMCID: PMC2846282          DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31819c1b83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  30 in total

1.  Interferences in immunoassay--still a threat.

Authors:  L J Kricka
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Urine drug screening in the medical setting.

Authors:  Catherine A Hammett-Stabler; Amadeo J Pesce; Donald J Cannon
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Comparable effects of DIGIBIND and DigiFab in thirteen digoxin immunoassays.

Authors:  Gwendolyn A McMillin; William E Owen; Thomas L Lambert; Barun K De; Elizabeth L Frank; Phillip R Bach; Thomas M Annesley; William L Roberts
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Similarity-based approaches to virtual screening.

Authors:  P Willett
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 5.  Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures.

Authors:  Jérôme Hert; Peter Willett; David J Wilton; Pierre Acklin; Kamal Azzaoui; Edgar Jacoby; Ansgar Schuffenhauer
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 May-Jun

6.  Anchoring a cationic ligand: the structure of the Fab fragment of the anti-morphine antibody 9B1 and its complex with morphine.

Authors:  Edwin Pozharski; Mark A Wilson; Anura Hewagama; Armen B Shanafelt; Gregory Petsko; Dagmar Ringe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  New predictive models for blood-brain barrier permeability of drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Dmitriy Chekmarev; William J Welsh; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Positive and negative in vitro interference of Chinese medicine dan shen in serum digoxin measurement. Elimination of interference by monitoring free digoxin concentration.

Authors:  A Wahed; A Dasgupta
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Digoxin assays: frequent, substantial, and potentially dangerous interference by spironolactone, canrenone, and other steroids.

Authors:  Werner Steimer; Christine Müller; Barbara Eber
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of cocaine binding by a novel human monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Stefan Paula; Michael R Tabet; Carol D Farr; Andrew B Norman; W James Ball
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  11 in total

1.  Discovery of a Novel HDAC2 Inhibitor by a Scaffold-Merging Hybrid Query.

Authors:  Nikita Basant; Xionghao Lin; Terry-Elinor Reid; Pradeep K Karla; Xiang S Wang
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.339

2.  Identification of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5 Potentiators Using Virtual High-Throughput Screening.

Authors:  Ralf Mueller; Alice L Rodriguez; Eric S Dawson; Mariusz Butkiewicz; Thuy T Nguyen; Stephen Oleszkiewicz; Annalen Bleckmann; C David Weaver; Craig W Lindsley; P Jeffrey Conn; Jens Meiler
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.418

3.  Application of grouping and read-across for the evaluation of parabens of different chain lengths with a particular focus on endocrine properties.

Authors:  Susann Fayyaz; Reinhard Kreiling; Ursula G Sauer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Using cheminformatics to predict cross reactivity of "designer drugs" to their currently available immunoassays.

Authors:  Matthew D Krasowski; Sean Ekins
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  Accidental intoxications in toddlers: lack of cross-reactivity of vilazodone and its urinary metabolite M17 with drug of abuse screening immunoassays.

Authors:  Christina D Martinez-Brokaw; Joshua B Radke; Joshua G Pierce; Alexandra Ehlers; Sean Ekins; Kelly E Wood; Jon Maakestad; Jacqueline A Rymer; Kenichi Tamama; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2019-02-18

6.  Using molecular similarity to highlight the challenges of routine immunoassay-based drug of abuse/toxicology screening in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Matthew D Krasowski; Anthony F Pizon; Mohamed G Siam; Spiros Giannoutsos; Manisha Iyer; Sean Ekins
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-04-28

7.  Cross-reactivity of steroid hormone immunoassays: clinical significance and two-dimensional molecular similarity prediction.

Authors:  Matthew D Krasowski; Denny Drees; Cory S Morris; Jon Maakestad; John L Blau; Sean Ekins
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-07-14

8.  A Difficult Challenge for the Clinical Laboratory: Accessing and Interpreting Manufacturer Cross-Reactivity Data for Immunoassays Used in Urine Drug Testing.

Authors:  Justine M Reschly-Krasowski; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2018-11-21

9.  Data on hydroxychloroquine interference with urine laboratory testing.

Authors:  Jennie M Kingery; Joshua B Radke; Jon Maakestad; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-11-08

10.  Diagnostic pitfalls and laboratory test interference after hydroxychloroquine intoxication: A case report.

Authors:  Joshua B Radke; Jennie M Kingery; Jon Maakestad; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2019-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.