STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study of patients with sciatica. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effectiveness of 3-dimensional high-spatial resolution diffusion-weighted MR neurography based on steady state free precession (3-dimensional diffusion-weighted steady-state free precession [DW-SSFP]) in the diagnosis of sciatica. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with sciatica challenge a physician who desires a precise diagnosis for the etiology of the pain. Direct imaging of the sciatic nerve with high resolution and high contrast may contribute to accurate localization and help to find the causes of sciatica and provide reliable information to clinicians in treatment choice. Thus, we supposed that 3-dimensional DW-SSFP method have the ability to confirm the etiologies of sciatica. METHODS: The 3-dimensional DW-SSFP sequence was performed on 137 patients with sciatica and 32 patients in control group. The postprocessing techniques were used to generate images of lumbosacral plexus and sciatic nerve, and the images acquired were assessed based on the presence or absence of nerve abnormality. The certainty of identifying the lumbosacral plexus and main branches from all cases was determined in each of the reconstruction planes for each case individually and assessed by using a 3-score scale. RESULTS: All subjects were successfully performed. The sciatic nerve and its main branches were differentiated and a clear picture was obtained in all subjects. Compared with the control group, the presence of nerve root compression or increased T2 signal intensity changes can be observed in all patients. The mean score of certainty of identifying the sciatic nerve and main branches was 1.76 +/- 0.4, which indicate that the sciatic nerve and main branches can be identified with certainty. CONCLUSION: The 3-dimensional DW-SSFP MRI with high spatial and sufficient contrast is an excellent technique to define the nature of sciatica and assists in prognostication and possibly in management.
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study of patients with sciatica. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effectiveness of 3-dimensional high-spatial resolution diffusion-weighted MR neurography based on steady state free precession (3-dimensional diffusion-weighted steady-state free precession [DW-SSFP]) in the diagnosis of sciatica. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with sciatica challenge a physician who desires a precise diagnosis for the etiology of the pain. Direct imaging of the sciatic nerve with high resolution and high contrast may contribute to accurate localization and help to find the causes of sciatica and provide reliable information to clinicians in treatment choice. Thus, we supposed that 3-dimensional DW-SSFP method have the ability to confirm the etiologies of sciatica. METHODS: The 3-dimensional DW-SSFP sequence was performed on 137 patients with sciatica and 32 patients in control group. The postprocessing techniques were used to generate images of lumbosacral plexus and sciatic nerve, and the images acquired were assessed based on the presence or absence of nerve abnormality. The certainty of identifying the lumbosacral plexus and main branches from all cases was determined in each of the reconstruction planes for each case individually and assessed by using a 3-score scale. RESULTS: All subjects were successfully performed. The sciatic nerve and its main branches were differentiated and a clear picture was obtained in all subjects. Compared with the control group, the presence of nerve root compression or increased T2 signal intensity changes can be observed in all patients. The mean score of certainty of identifying the sciatic nerve and main branches was 1.76 +/- 0.4, which indicate that the sciatic nerve and main branches can be identified with certainty. CONCLUSION: The 3-dimensional DW-SSFP MRI with high spatial and sufficient contrast is an excellent technique to define the nature of sciatica and assists in prognostication and possibly in management.
Authors: S K Thawait; V Chaudhry; G K Thawait; K C Wang; A Belzberg; J A Carrino; A Chhabra Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Giovanna S Danagoulian; Lei Qin; Krishna S Nayak; Rivka R Colen; Srinivasan Mukundan; Mitchell B Harris; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; William A Copen; Ehud J Schmidt Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: S K Thawait; K Wang; T K Subhawong; E H Williams; S S Hashemi; A J Machado; G K Thawait; T Soldatos; J A Carrino; A Chhabra Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Dimitrios C Karampinos; Gerd Melkus; Timothy M Shepherd; Suchandrima Banerjee; Emine U Saritas; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; Christopher P Hess; Thomas M Link; William P Dillon; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Avneesh Chhabra; Filippo Del Grande; Theodoros Soldatos; Majid Chalian; Allan J Belzberg; Eric H Williams; Farahani S Jalali; Gaurav K Thawait; John Eng; John A Carrino Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Avneesh Chhabra; Lianxin Zhao; John A Carrino; Eo Trueblood; Saso Koceski; Filip Shteriev; Lionel Lenkinski; Christopher D J Sinclair; Gustav Andreisek Journal: Radiol Res Pract Date: 2013-03-26