PURPOSE: Anthracyclines and concurrent whole-breast irradiation result in prohibitive cutaneous toxicity. We hypothesized that anthracycline-based chemotherapy and concurrent partial breast irradiation (PBI) is safe and conducted a single-arm feasibility trial testing this hypothesis with dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with T1-2, N0-1 breast cancer with > or = 3 mm lumpectomy margins received PBI (40.5 Gy, 15 daily 2.7-Gy fractions) concurrently with the first two of four cycles of ddAC (60 and 600 mg/m2 of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, respectively, every 14 days with colony-stimulating support). Primary end points were local and systemic toxicity. Additional systemic therapy was given at the physician's discretion. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients enrolled between November 2004 and January 2007, but two patients did not receive protocol therapy (one found with additional local disease and one withdrew consent). Twenty-five women completed all planned PBI. Four (16%) of 25 did not complete all ddAC (febrile neutropenia [FN], n = 2; diverticulitis and neutropenia, n = 1; and social/economic reasons, n = 1). Four among the remaining 21 who completed all ddAC had a cycle delayed (FN, n = 1; acute respiratory illness, n = 1; foot blisters, n = 1; perianal dermatitis, n = 1). There was no grade 3 to 4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities (none grade 4) occurred in 28% (seven of 25) of patients (nausea/vomiting, n = 3; stomatitis, n = 2; contralateral breast abscess, n = 1; fatigue, n = 1; and cough/bronchospasms, n = 1). The observed rate of > or = grade 2 skin toxicity was 0% (0 of 25; one-sided 95% CI, 0% to 11%). CONCLUSION: PBI with concurrent ddAC is feasible, and local/systemic toxicity is acceptable. Larger studies are warranted to assess long-term locoregional control and late toxicities.
PURPOSE:Anthracyclines and concurrent whole-breast irradiation result in prohibitive cutaneous toxicity. We hypothesized that anthracycline-based chemotherapy and concurrent partial breast irradiation (PBI) is safe and conducted a single-arm feasibility trial testing this hypothesis with dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with T1-2, N0-1 breast cancer with > or = 3 mm lumpectomy margins received PBI (40.5 Gy, 15 daily 2.7-Gy fractions) concurrently with the first two of four cycles of ddAC (60 and 600 mg/m2 of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, respectively, every 14 days with colony-stimulating support). Primary end points were local and systemic toxicity. Additional systemic therapy was given at the physician's discretion. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients enrolled between November 2004 and January 2007, but two patients did not receive protocol therapy (one found with additional local disease and one withdrew consent). Twenty-five women completed all planned PBI. Four (16%) of 25 did not complete all ddAC (febrile neutropenia [FN], n = 2; diverticulitis and neutropenia, n = 1; and social/economic reasons, n = 1). Four among the remaining 21 who completed all ddAC had a cycle delayed (FN, n = 1; acute respiratory illness, n = 1; foot blisters, n = 1; perianal dermatitis, n = 1). There was no grade 3 to 4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities (none grade 4) occurred in 28% (seven of 25) of patients (nausea/vomiting, n = 3; stomatitis, n = 2; contralateral breast abscess, n = 1; fatigue, n = 1; and cough/bronchospasms, n = 1). The observed rate of > or = grade 2 skin toxicity was 0% (0 of 25; one-sided 95% CI, 0% to 11%). CONCLUSION:PBI with concurrent ddAC is feasible, and local/systemic toxicity is acceptable. Larger studies are warranted to assess long-term locoregional control and late toxicities.
Authors: Pamela R Benitez; Oscar Streeter; Frank Vicini; Vivek Mehta; Coral Quiet; Robert Kuske; Mary Katherine Hayes; Doug Arthur; Henry Kuerer; Gary Freedman; Martin Keisch; Thomas Dipetrillo; David Khan; Richard Hudes Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: A Dubey; A Recht; S E Come; R S Gelman; B Silver; J R Harris; L N Shulman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Roberto Orecchia; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Mario Ciocca; Silvia Franzetti; Giovanni Gatti; U Veronesi Journal: Expert Rev Anticancer Ther Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 4.512
Authors: Timothy Whelan; Robert MacKenzie; Jim Julian; Mark Levine; Wendy Shelley; Laval Grimard; Barbara Lada; Himu Lukka; Francisco Perera; Anthony Fyles; Ethan Laukkanen; Sunil Gulavita; Veronique Benk; Barbara Szechtman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-08-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Silvia C Formenti; Minh Tam Truong; Judith D Goldberg; Vandana Mukhi; Barry Rosenstein; Daniel Roses; Richard Shapiro; Amber Guth; J Keith Dewyngaert Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Arif Y Shaikh; Michael A LaCombe; Hongyan Du; Vathsala T Raghavan; Ranjeev K Nanda; William D Bloomer Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Eloise Thomas; Jyothi U Menon; Joshua Owen; Irini Skaripa-Koukelli; Sheena Wallington; Michael Gray; Christophoros Mannaris; Veerle Kersemans; Danny Allen; Paul Kinchesh; Sean Smart; Robert Carlisle; Katherine A Vallis Journal: Theranostics Date: 2019-07-28 Impact factor: 11.600