Literature DB >> 16978943

Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study.

Pamela R Benitez1, Oscar Streeter, Frank Vicini, Vivek Mehta, Coral Quiet, Robert Kuske, Mary Katherine Hayes, Doug Arthur, Henry Kuerer, Gary Freedman, Martin Keisch, Thomas Dipetrillo, David Khan, Richard Hudes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This report presents the preliminary results and evaluation of the MammoSite balloon catheter (MammoSite Radiation Therapy System; Cytyc Corporation, Marlboro, MA) as the sole method of delivering partial breast irradiation to the lumpectomy bed with breast-conserving surgery in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
METHODS: Twelve institutions are participating in this phase II clinical study. A total of 133 patients have been enrolled and 100 patients have successfully completed the prescribed radiation therapy. A dose of 34 Gy was delivered in 10 fractions over 5 days prescribed to 1 cm from the applicator surface using iridium-192 high-dose rate brachytherapy. Patients who met the following criteria were selected for enrollment into the study: age 45 years or older, unicentric pure DCIS, mammographic lesion of 3 cm or less, negative margins as defined by 1 mm or more, postoperative final gross pathologic size of tumor of 5 cm or less, clinically node negative, and a postlumpectomy mammogram showing the absence of any residual suspicious microcalcifications. The placement of the MammoSite catheter was performed either at the time of the lumpectomy or postlumpectomy. The minimum distance from the balloon surface to the surface of the skin is greater than 5 mm. Data collection points are at time of enrollment, time of implant, 3 months, 6 months, and then yearly at 1- to 5-year follow-up visits. Data collected are local control rates, cosmetic outcome using the Harvard Scale, toxicities, serious adverse events, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and contralateral breast failure. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index scores were calculated for each patient. Local recurrence is defined as either invasive or noninvasive recurrence within the target volume. Ipsilateral elsewhere recurrence is defined as either an invasive or noninvasive recurrence occurring outside of the target volume in the previously treated breast. This recurrence is classified as a new primary tumor.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 9.5 months (range, 1-24 mo). The MammoSite catheter was explanted for the following reasons: inadequate skin distance (5.1%; 6 of 117), poor cavity conformance (5.1%; 6 of 117), positive margins (2.6%; 3 of 117), final histology (.85%; 1 of 117), and physician decision (.85%; 1 of 117). Of the patients in whom the MammoSite was explanted because of skin spacing or cavity conformance, 50% were at sites of new users (institutions that have placed fewer than 10 Mammosite catheters). Cosmetic results were rated as excellent in 63%, good in 35%, and fair in 2% in the 86 patients with a follow-up visit. Two patients were diagnosed with an ipsilateral local recurrence, 1 outside of the target volume and 1 true recurrence/marginal miss. One patient was diagnosed at 8 months and the other was diagnosed at 11 months. Both of these ipsilateral failures were DCIS. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index of these 2 patients was 9 and 8, respectively. Data collected showed the mean age at placement was 60.8 y, mean tumor size was 10.6 mm, mean actual closest surgical margin was 6.8 mm (range, .1-40 mm), a re-excision rate of 35%, postlumpectomy placement was 71%, and the mean skin-to-balloon surface distance was 13 mm with 89% > or =7 mm. No serious adverse events were reported. The infection rate was 4.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated partial breast irradiation delivered with the MammoSite balloon was clinically successful in patients entered into a phase II clinical study with pure DCIS, with results comparable with other studies reported in the literature that have evaluated use of the MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for delivery of radiation therapy in early breast cancers. Inadequate skin distance and poor cavity conformance were the main factors limiting the use of the MammoSite device. Cosmetic results were good to excellent in 98%. There have been 2 ipsilateral breast recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16978943     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  15 in total

1.  Characterization and treatment of local recurrence following breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Laurel A Habel; Melissa E Hughes; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Ninah Achacoso; Luana Acton; Deborah Schrag; Wei Jiang; Stephen Edge; Jane C Weeks; Rinaa S Punglia
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Overview of accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Todd A Swanson; Frank A Vicini
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Partial breast irradiation: a review of techniques and indications.

Authors:  A J Stewart; A J Khan; P M Devlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation through brachytherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: factors influencing utilization and risks of second breast tumors.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Derek T Schloemann; Min Lian; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Comparison of organ doses for patients undergoing balloon brachytherapy of the breast with HDR 192Ir or electronic sources using monte carlo simulations in a heterogeneous human phantom.

Authors:  Matthew M Mille; X George Xu; Mark J Rivard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Tatyana Shamliyan; Shi-Yi Wang; Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 7.  Radiation therapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Georgios Koukourakis
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 8.  The role of radiotherapy in the conservative treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Csaba Polgár; Zsuzsanna Kahán; Zsolt Orosz; Gabriella Gábor; Janaki Hadijev; Gábor Cserni; Janina Kulka; Nóra Jani; Zoltán Sulyok; György Lázár; Gábor Boross; Csaba Diczházi; Eva Szabó; Zsolt László; Zoltán Péntek; Tibor Major; János Fodor
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Incidence and prognostic factors for seroma development after MammoSite breast brachytherapy.

Authors:  John M Watkins; Jennifer L Harper; Anthony E Dragun; Michael S Ashenafi; Debajyoti Sinha; Jun Li; David J Cole; Joseph M Jenrette
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Feasibility trial of partial breast irradiation with concurrent dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard C Zellars; Vered Stearns; Deborah Frassica; Fariba Asrari; Theodore Tsangaris; Lee Myers; Shirley DiPasquale; Julie R Lange; Lisa K Jacobs; Leisha A Emens; Deborah K Armstrong; John H Fetting; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Nancy E Davidson; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.