Literature DB >> 19331496

The coding and effector transfer of movement sequences.

Attila J Kovacs1, Thomas Mühlbauer, Charles H Shea.   

Abstract

Three experiments utilizing a 14-element arm movement sequence were designed to determine if reinstating the visual-spatial coordinates, which require movements to the same spatial locations utilized during acquisition, results in better effector transfer than reinstating the motor coordinates, which require the same pattern of homologous muscle activation. Results demonstrated better transfer when visual-spatial coordinates were reinstated than when motor coordinates where reinstated regardless of the amount of practice (1, 4, or 12 days; Experiments 1-3, respectively). Transfer (left to right and right to left) was symmetric when visual-spatial coordinates were reinstated but not when motor coordinates were reinstated. When motor coordinates were reinstated after 12 days of practice and vision occluded, transfer was better from right limb to left than vice versa. The data are also consistent with the notion that multiple codes (visual, spatial, and motor) are developed over practice, with each contributing to transfer performance when the respective coordinates are reinstated. Further, the results indicate a disruption of the linkage (concatenation) between subsequences when one or more coordinates are changed on the transfer test. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19331496     DOI: 10.1037/a0012733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

1.  Practice makes transfer of motor skills imperfect.

Authors:  Arnaud Boutin; Arnaud Badets; Robin N Salesse; Udo Fries; Stefan Panzer; Yannick Blandin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-14

2.  A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Charles H Shea; David L Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

3.  Changes in motor performance and mental workload during practice of reaching movements: a team dynamics perspective.

Authors:  Isabelle M Shuggi; Patricia A Shewokis; Jeffrey W Herrmann; Rodolphe J Gentili
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dissociable contributions of motor-execution and action-observation to intramanual transfer.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Digby Elliott; Matthew Andrew; James W Roberts; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effector-independent motor sequence representations exist in extrinsic and intrinsic reference frames.

Authors:  Tobias Wiestler; Sheena Waters-Metenier; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The coding and inter-manual transfer of movement sequences.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Attila J Kovacs; Stefan Panzer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-08

7.  The stuff that motor chunks are made of: Spatial instead of motor representations?

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Eduard C Groen; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Control of automated behavior: insights from the discrete sequence production task.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Marit F L Ruitenberg; Elian de Kleine; Willem B Verwey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Watch me if you can: imagery ability moderates observational learning effectiveness.

Authors:  Gavin Lawrence; Nichola Callow; Ross Roberts
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Sleep-related offline learning in a complex arm movement sequence.

Authors:  Andreas Malangré; Peter Leinen; Klaus Blischke
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.